Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496905›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Bacteriuria in Cystocentesis Samples from Cats in the United Kingdom: Prevalence, Bacterial Isolates, and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities.

Clarisse D'Août, Samantha S Taylor, Stefania Gelendi, Carl Atkinson, Pieter Defauw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clarisse D'AoûtInternal Medicine Department, Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Selborne Road, Alton GU34 3HL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5241-5377
Samantha S TaylorInternal Medicine Department, Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Selborne Road, Alton GU34 3HL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-0777
Stefania GelendiRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 6RG, UK.
Carl AtkinsonAxiom Veterinary Laboratories Ltd., Manor House, Brunel Rd, Newton Abbott TQ12 4PB, UK.
Pieter DefauwInternal Medicine Department, Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Selborne Road, Alton GU34 3HL, UK.
Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service · GBAbbott (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) have historically been reported to be uncommon in cats; however, recent studies showed a higher prevalence. Bacterial UTIs are one of the most common reasons for the use of antimicrobial drugs in veterinary medicine. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of positive cultures in urine samples submitted to a UK laboratory for testing, as well as prevalence of bacterial species and their antimicrobial susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics. This was a retrospective analysis of positive cultures from feline urine samples collected by cystocentesis submitted over 14 months (January 2018-February 2019). A total of 2712 samples were reviewed, of which 425 documented a positive culture (15.7%) with a total of 444 bacterial isolates.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancefeline lower urinary tract diseaseurinary tract infectionsurine culture

Identifiers

PMID36496905
PMCPMC9739958
OpenAlexW4311103999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.