Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496900›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Impacts of the Wild Boar (

Romaan Hayat Khattak, Liwei Teng, Tahir Mehmood, Shakeel Ahmad, Zhensheng Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Romaan Hayat KhattakCollege of Wildlife and Protected Areas, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8047-1835
Liwei TengCollege of Wildlife and Protected Areas, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Tahir MehmoodSchool of Natural Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9775-8093
Shakeel AhmadCarnivore Conservation Lab, Department of Zoology, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
Zhensheng LiuCollege of Wildlife and Protected Areas, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
State Forestry and Grassland Administration · CNGuangdong Academy of Sciences · CNNational University of Sciences and Technology · PKQuaid-i-Azam University · PK

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, National Forestry and Grassland Administration China, The Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program for Forest Ecology and Conservation, and the Key Research and Develop 2020BEG02001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation goals can only be best achieved when there is firm support and cooperation from locals, especially in emerging economies where poor communities often bear most of the cost of human-wildlife conflicts (HWCs). In this study, we explored the economic losses caused by wild boars in two districts, i.e., the Peshawar district and the Nowshera district, in north-western Pakistan. Between May and June 2022, 589 respondents from 53 villages were interviewed. The results revealed that the wild boar was chiefly involved in crop raiding, causing an annual economic loss of USD 12,030 (USD 20.42/household). The highly raided crops included maize (40.24%), followed by wheat (24.95%), vegetables (22.65%), and sugarcane (6.29%). Wild boars were also held accountable for orchard damages. Most people consider the wild boar a common species in the area and want it completely eliminated. We believe that the increasing wild boar population is alarming and should be noticed. The government should collaborate with the local communities to use innovative methods to deter wild boars. Compensation schemes for crop damages should be launched. Moreover, the regular investigation of the wild boar population size and their carrying capacities should be enlisted as integral parts of wildlife management in the area.

Indexed as

crop raidingeconomic losseshuman–wildlife conflictsnorth-western Pakistanorchard damagepest animalsquestionnaires surveySus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID36496900
PMCPMC9739611
OpenAlexW4311104089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.