Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496810›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

A Qualitative Exploration of Challenges and Opportunities for Dog Welfare in Ireland Post COVID-19, as Perceived by Dog Welfare Organisations.

Blain Murphy, Claire McKernan, Catherine Lawler, Patrica Reilly, Locksley L McV Messam, Daniel Collins, Sean M Murray, Rob Doyle, Natascha Meunier, Aiden Maguire and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Blain MurphyInstitute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.
Claire McKernanInstitute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.
Catherine LawlerDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, D02 WK12 Dublin, Ireland.
Patrica ReillyDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, D02 WK12 Dublin, Ireland.
Locksley L McV MessamUCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5791-555X
Daniel CollinsCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin Belfield, D04 W6F6 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4365-6707
Sean M MurrayDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, D02 WK12 Dublin, Ireland.
Rob DoyleDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, D02 WK12 Dublin, Ireland.
Natascha MeunierAnimal Health Ireland, Apartment 3, Carrick-On-Shannon, N41 WN27 Co. Leitrim, Ireland.
Aiden MaguireDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, D02 WK12 Dublin, Ireland.
Simon J MoreUCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-0385

Funding

Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This novel qualitative study identifies challenges and opportunities to improve dog welfare in Ireland, as perceived by dog welfare organisations (DWOs), a previously underutilised stakeholder. This study sought the views of this predominantly voluntary sector of the next steps for policy and action in dog welfare, in light of the effects of the "puppy pandemic", increased costs and COVID-19 restrictions. An integrated online focus group and interview design involving DWOs was analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Thematic analysis identified 2 key themes: (1) Key challenges and solutions in general dog welfare and (2) Challenges and opportunities in the welfare organisation sector. DWOs perceived poor public awareness of appropriate dog-husbandry, inadequate legislation enforcement, negative impact of puppy farms, and increased financial and volunteer burden. DWOs helped construct a best practice rehoming pathway, identified how overall standards could be improved and recommendations to enhance dog welfare. The DWOs perceived an increased numbers of households acquiring dogs, difficulties in rehoming, and financial challenges as threatening their viability as organisations and Irish dog welfare. Greater enforcement of legislation, greater communication between organisations and the government, and more media awareness were seen as helpful by the DWOs to improve dog welfare standards and their organisations.

Indexed as

animal welfarechallenges and solutionsCOVID-19dog welfaredog welfare organisationsperceptionsqualitative researchthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID36496810
PMCPMC9739681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.