Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496807›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Determination of Ram (

Pedro Javier Soria-Meneses, Alejandro Jurado-Campos, Virgilio Gómez-Rubio, Irene Sánchez-Ajofrín, Ana Josefa Soler, José Julián Garde, María Del Rocío Fernández-Santos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro Javier Soria-MenesesSaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5648-5308
Alejandro Jurado-CamposSaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-9561
Virgilio Gómez-RubioDepartamento de Matemáticas, ETSIIA, UCLM, Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4791-3072
Irene Sánchez-AjofrínSaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8232-3940
Ana Josefa SolerSaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6429-5157
José Julián GardeSaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-6518
María Del Rocío Fernández-SantosSaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario, s/n, 02071 Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3359-1623
Hospital General Universitario de Albacete · ES

Funding

Education and Science Council of Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain SBPLY/17/180501/000369Education and Science Council of Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain SBPLY/21/180501/000111Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain AGL2017-85603-PMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain PID2020-120281RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional DNA analysis techniques can hardly detect DNA damage in ruminant spermatozoa due to high DNA compaction in these cells. Furthermore, these techniques cannot discriminate whether the damage is due to oxidative stress. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two techniques for determining DNA damage in ovine sperm when the source of that damage is oxidative stress. Semen samples from twenty Manchega rams (Ovis aries) were collected and cryopreserved. After thawing, the samples were subjected to different levels of oxidative stress, and DNA oxidation was quantified using an 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) immunodetection assay and Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®). For this purpose, we evaluated five different concentrations of an oxidation solution (H2O2/FeSO4•7H2O) on ram sperm DNA. Our study with the 8-OHdG immunodetection assay shows that there are higher values for DNA oxidation in samples that were subjected to the highest oxidative stress (8 M H2O2/800 µM FeSO4•7H2O) and those that were not exposed to high oxidative stress, but these differences were not significant (p ≥ 0.05). The two SCSA® parameters considered, DNA fragmentation index (DFI %) and high DNA stainability (HDS %), showed significant differences between samples that were subjected to high concentrations of the oxidation agent and those that were not (p < 0.05). We can conclude that the 8-OHdG immunodetection assay and SCSA® detect DNA damage caused by oxidative stress in ovine sperm under high oxidative conditions; SCSA® is a more straightforward method with more accurate results. For these reasons, an oxidative-stress-specific assay such as 8-OHdG immunodetection is not needed to measure DNA damage caused by oxidative stress in ram sperm samples.

Indexed as

8-OHdGDNAflow cytometryoxidative stressram spermSCSA®

Identifiers

PMID36496807
PMCPMC9737133
OpenAlexW4310193731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.