Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496732›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Emerging Postharvest Technologies to Enhance the Shelf-Life of Fruit and Vegetables: An Overview.

Michela Palumbo, Giovanni Attolico, Vittorio Capozzi, Rosaria Cozzolino, Antonia Corvino, Maria Lucia Valeria de Chiara, Bernardo Pace, Sergio Pelosi, Ilde Ricci, Roberto Romaniello and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multi-omics analysis of non-pungent (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michela PalumboDepartment of Science of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Giovanni AttolicoInstitute on Intelligent Industrial Systems and Technologies for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via G. Amendola, 122/O, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Vittorio CapozziInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0717-0753
Rosaria CozzolinoInstitute of Food Science, National Research Council (CNR), Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-2648
Antonia CorvinoInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-725X
Maria Lucia Valeria de ChiaraDepartment of Science of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-9758
Bernardo PaceInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4606-2165
Sergio PelosiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Ilde RicciInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Roberto RomanielloDepartment of Science of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-0486
Maria CefolaInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4212-8331

Funding

PON «R&I» 2014-2020-Azione II- "Shelf life, quality, and safety of fruit and vegetables with a high service content" POFACS-" ARS01_00640the project Prin 2017 "Multifunctional polymer composites based on grown materials (MI-FLOWER)" 2017B7MMJ5_001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality losses in fresh produce throughout the postharvest phase are often due to the inappropriate use of preservation technologies. In the last few decades, besides the traditional approaches, advanced postharvest physical and chemical treatments (active packaging, dipping, vacuum impregnation, conventional heating, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, and cold plasma) and biocontrol techniques have been implemented to preserve the nutritional value and safety of fresh produce. The application of these methodologies after harvesting is useful when addressing quality loss due to the long duration when transporting products to distant markets. Among the emerging technologies and contactless and non-destructive techniques for quality monitoring (image analysis, electronic noses, and near-infrared spectroscopy) present numerous advantages over the traditional, destructive methods. The present review paper has grouped original studies within the topic of advanced postharvest technologies, to preserve quality and reduce losses and waste in fresh produce. Moreover, the effectiveness and advantages of some contactless and non-destructive methodologies for monitoring the quality of fruit and vegetables will also be discussed and compared to the traditional methods.

Indexed as

active packagingcold plasmadippingE-nosehigh hydrostatic pressureimage analysisinnovative postharvest technologiesnear-infrared spectroscopypulsed electric fieldvacuum impregnation

Identifiers

PMID36496732
PMCPMC9737221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.