ArticleScientific reports2022
Identification of cuproptosis-related long noncoding RNA signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in bladder cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cuproptosis in lung cancer: a nexus of ncRNA regulation, epigenetics, and tumor microenvironment Remodeling.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Non-coding RNAs in programmed cell death regulation in melanoma: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- lncRNAs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis-mediated cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- Construction of prognostic risk model of bladder cancer based on cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNAs.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- Construction and Assessment of a Prognostic Risk Model for Cervical Cancer Based on Lactate Metabolism-Related lncRNAs.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumour of the urinary system and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Cuproptosis is a novel form of programmed cell death, and its mechanism in tumours remains unclear. This study aimed to establish the prognostic signatures of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs and determine their clinical prognostic value. RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to detect the expression levels of cuproptosis-related genes in BC. Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs linked to survival were identified using co-expression and univariate Cox regression. Furthermore, consensus cluster analysis divided the lncRNAs into two subtypes. Subsequently, we established a signature model consisting of seven cuproptosis-related lncRNAs (AC073534.2, AC021321.1, HYI-AS1, PPP1R26-AS1, AC010328.1, AC012568.1 and MIR4435-2Hg) using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Survival analysis based on risk score showed that the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients in the high-risk group were worse than those in the low-risk group. Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated the independent prognostic potential of this signature model for patients with BC. Moreover, age and clinical stage were also significantly correlated with prognosis. The constructed nomogram plots revealed good predictive power for the prognosis of patients with BC and were validated using calibration plots. Additionally, enrichment analysis, Single sample gene set enrichment analysis and immune infiltration abundance analysis revealed significant differences in immune infiltration between the two risk groups, with high levels of immune cell subset infiltrations observed in the high-risk group accompanied by various immune pathway activation. Moreover, almost all the immune checkpoint genes showed high expression levels in the high-risk group. Moreover, TIDE analysis suggested that the high-risk group was more responsive to immunotherapy. Finally, eight drugs with low IC50 values were screened, which may prove to be beneficial for patients in the high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.