Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496506›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Offline rTMS inhibition of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs reappraisal efficacy.

Miroslaw Wyczesany, Agnieszka K Adamczyk, Justyna Hobot, Giansalvo Barbalinardo, Przemysław Adamczyk, Adam Labaza, Tomasz S Ligeza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A transdisciplinary framework for empathy research.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Miroslaw WyczesanyInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland. m.wyczesany@uj.edu.pl.
Agnieszka K AdamczykInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland.
Justyna HobotInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland.
Giansalvo BarbalinardoInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland.
Przemysław AdamczykInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland.
Adam LabazaInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland.
Tomasz S LigezaInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków, Poland.
Institute of Psychology · PLJagiellonian University · PLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

National Science Center 2016/21/B/HS6/03723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we verified the causal role of the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in emotional regulation using a strategy of reappraisal, which involves intentionally changing the meaning of an affective event to reduce its emotional impact. Healthy participants (n = 26; mean age = 25.4) underwent three sessions of inhibitory continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) applied on three different days over the left or right DLPFC, or the vertex. After applying the stimulation protocol participants were presented with neutral and negative pictorial stimuli that had to be either passively watched or reappraised. The efficacy of emotional control was quantified using the Late Positive Potential (LPP), the neural marker of motivated attention and elaborated stimulus processing. The results showed that reappraisal was compromised after inhibitory stimulation of the right DLPFC compared to the vertex. This impairment of affective modulation was reflected in both early (350-750 ms) and late (750-1500 ms) time windows. As no session differences during the passive watching conditions were found, the decrease in reappraisal efficacy due to non-specific changes in basic perceptual processing was considered unlikely. Instead, we suggest that inhibition of the right DLPFC primarily affects the top-down mechanism of attentional deployment. This results in disturbances of attentional processes that are necessary to thoroughly elaborate the content of affective stimuli to enable their new, less negative interpretation.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexEmotionsHumansInhibition, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID36496506
PMCPMC9741580
OpenAlexW4311668212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.