Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36496482›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of biomedical engineering2022

Kinematics of the Cervical Spine Under Healthy and Degenerative Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Sara Lindenmann, Christos Tsagkaris, Mazda Farshad, Jonas Widmer

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preoperative 3D surgical planning using Mimics significantly decreased the rate of internal fixation in cervical dumbbell tumor resection and improved the postoperative outcome: a single-center retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the upper cervical spine during upright head rotation in patients with atlantoaxial dislocation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Identifying biomechanical and neurophysiological risk factors for postoperative neurologic deterioration in OPLL surgery: A study using ROC curve and path analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cervical disk arthroplasty: The new gold standard?Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Lindenmann *Spine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christos Tsagkaris *Spine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mazda FarshadSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WidmerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. jonas.widmer@hest.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-4387
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of spinal kinematics is essential for the diagnosis and management of spinal diseases. Distinguishing between physiological and pathological motion patterns can help diagnose these diseases, plan surgical interventions and improve relevant tools and software. During the last decades, numerous studies based on diverse methodologies attempted to elucidate spinal mobility in different planes of motion. The authors aimed to summarize and compare the evidence about cervical spine kinematics under healthy and degenerative conditions. This includes an illustrated description of the spectrum of physiological cervical spine kinematics, followed by a comparable presentation of kinematics of the degenerative cervical spine. Data was obtained through a systematic MEDLINE search including studies on angular/translational segmental motion contribution, range of motion, coupling and center of rotation. As far as the degenerative conditions are concerned, kinematic data regarding disc degeneration and spondylolisthesis were available. Although the majority of the studies identified repeating motion patterns for most motion planes, discrepancies associated with limited sample sizes and different imaging techniques and/or spine configurations, were noted. Among healthy/asymptomatic individuals, flexion extension (FE) and lateral bending (LB) are mainly facilitated by the subaxial cervical spine. C4-C5 and C5-C6 were the major FE contributors in the reported studies, exceeding the motion contribution of sub-adjacent segments. Axial rotation (AR) greatly depends on C1-C2. FE range of motion (ROM) is distributed between the atlantoaxial and subaxial segments, while AR ROM stems mainly from the former and LB ROM from the latter. In coupled motion rotation is quantitatively predominant over translation. Motion migrates caudally from C1-C2 and the center of rotation (COR) translocates anteriorly and superiorly for each successive subaxial segment. In degenerative settings, concurrent or subsequent lesions render the association between diseases and mobility alterations challenging. The affected segments seem to maintain translational and angular motion in early and moderate degeneration. However, the progression of degeneration restrains mobility, which seems to be maintained or compensated by adjacent non-affected segments. While the kinematics of the healthy cervical spine have been addressed by multiple studies, the entire nosological and kinematic spectrum of cervical spine degeneration is partially addressed. Large-scale in vivo studies can complement the existing evidence, cover the gaps and pave the way to technological and clinical breakthroughs.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSpinal DiseasesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansRange of Motion, ArticularRotationAxial rotationCenter of rotationExtensionFlexionLateral bendingMotionRange of motion

Identifiers

PMID36496482
PMCPMC9794546
OpenAlexW4311114245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.