Comparison of Race-Based and Non-Race-Based Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations for the Assessment of Renal Functional Risk Before Nephrectomy.

objectiveTo compare the performance of race-based and race-neutral estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculators in patients undergoing kidney surgery.

methodsAnalysis of institutional kidneys surgeries from 2006-2021 was conducted. Demographics, serum creatinine (SCr), protein dipstick, and creatinine clearance (CrCl) were assessed within 1 week prior to surgery. SCr was used to calculate eGFR using 3 models: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI 2009), and CKD-EPI 2021. Patients were classified based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for CKD staging and prognosis, with urine CrCl treated as benchmark for analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated accuracy of eGFR calculators' binary discrimination of eGFR less than 60 mL/min. CKD stage agreement between eGFR and urine CrCl was assessed.

resultsA total of 554 kidney surgeries in 336 patients had necessary laboratory data for analysis. The cohort was 62% male, with a median age of 47. Within this cohort, 8.1% (n=45) were Black, and 80% (n=441) were White. glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from 24-hour urine CrCl normalized by BSA did not vary significantly from eGFR by SCr based calculators. The proportion of patients with eGFR <60 significantly differed when using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, CKD-EPI 2009, and CKD-EPI 2021 equations when compared to CrCl (P<.001). Still, they performed equivalently in the staging of CKD, as well as in predicting GFR of less than 60, and classifying CKD prognosis of "moderately increased or higher".

conclusionA race-neutral eGFR calculator can perform equivalently to established eGFR calculators, with the added benefit of mitigating biases that account for racial disparities in nephrectomy decision making.