Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36495882›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2023

Evaluation of the safety, immunogenicity, and faecal shedding of novel oral polio vaccine type 2 in healthy newborn infants in Bangladesh: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 clinical trial.

Khaelqu Zaman, Ananda S Bandyopadhyay, Masuma Hoque, Christopher Gast, Mohammad Yunus, Khondoker M Jamil, Bernardo A Mainou, Jennifer L Konopka-Anstadt, William S Hendley, Annelet Vincent and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04693286 (A Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Novel Oral Polio Type 2 Vaccine Candidate in Healthy Newborns in Bangladesh), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04693286 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Novel Oral Polio Type 2 Vaccine Candidate in Healthy Newborns in Bangladesh

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshRan2020 to 2021Enrolled330ConditionsPoliomyelitisArmsnovel oral polio type 2 vaccine (nOPV2), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Intestinal Mucosal Immune Responses to Novel Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Type 2 in Healthy Newborns.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Khaelqu ZamanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Chandpur, Bangladesh.
Ananda S BandyopadhyayBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: ananda.bandyopadhyay@gatesfoundation.org.
Masuma HoqueInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Chandpur, Bangladesh.
Christopher GastPATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mohammad YunusInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Chandpur, Bangladesh.
Khondoker M JamilNational Polio and Measles Laboratory, Institute of Public Health, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bernardo A MainouUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jennifer L Konopka-AnstadtPATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
William S HendleyUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Annelet VincentUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ralf ClemensGlobal Research in Infectious Diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sue Ann Costa ClemensGlobal Research in Infectious Diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Paediatrics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Allen G RossInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Chandpur, Bangladesh; Rural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
John D ClemensInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Chandpur, Bangladesh; International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Erman TritamaPT Bio Farma, Bandung, Indonesia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USCharles Sturt University · AUInternational Vaccine Institute · KRNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases · BDPT Bio Farma (Indonesia) · IDUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV2) from Sabin oral poliovirus vaccines (OPVs) are the leading cause of poliomyelitis. A novel type 2 OPV (nOPV2) has been developed to be more genetically stable with similar tolerability and immunogenicity to that of Sabin type 2 vaccines to mitigate the risk of cVDPV2. We aimed to assess these aspects of nOPV2 in poliovirus vaccine-naive newborn infants.

methodsIn this randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2 trial we enrolled newborn infants at the Matlab Health Research Centre, Chandpur, Bangladesh. We included infants who were healthy and were a single birth after at least 37 weeks' gestation. Infants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either two doses of nOPV2 or placebo, administered at age 0-3 days and at 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria included receipt of rotavirus or any other poliovirus vaccine, any infection or illness at the time of enrolment (vomiting, diarrhoea, or intolerance to liquids), diagnosis or suspicion of any immunodeficiency disorder in the infant or a close family member, or any contraindication for venipuncture. The primary safety outcome was safety and tolerability after one and two doses of nOPV2, given 4 weeks apart in poliovirus vaccine-naive newborn infants and the primary immunogenicity outcome was the seroconversion rate for neutralising antibodies against type 2 poliovirus, measured 28 days after the first and second vaccinations with nOPV2. Study staff recorded solicited and unsolicited adverse events after each dose during daily home visits for 7 days. Poliovirus neutralising antibody responses were measured in sera drawn at birth and at age 4 weeks and 8 weeks. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04693286.

findingsBetween Sept 21, 2020, and Aug 16, 2021, we screened 334 newborn infants, of whom three (<1%) were found to be ineligible and one (<1%) was withdrawn by the parents; the remaining 330 (99%) infants were assigned to receive nOPV2 (n=220 [67%]) or placebo (n=110 [33%]). nOPV2 was well tolerated; 154 (70%) of 220 newborn infants in the nOPV2 group and 78 (71%) of 110 in the placebo group had solicited adverse events, which were all mild or moderate in severity. Severe unsolicited adverse events in 11 (5%) vaccine recipients and five (5%) placebo recipients were considered unrelated to vaccination. 306 (93%) of 330 infants had seroprotective maternal antibodies against type 2 poliovirus at birth, decreasing to 58 (56%) of 104 in the placebo group at 8 weeks. In the nOPV2 group 196 (90%) of 217 infants seroconverted by week 8 after two doses, when 214 (99%) had seroprotective antibodies.

interpretationnOPV2 was well tolerated and immunogenic in newborn infants, with two doses, at birth and 4 weeks, resulting in almost 99% of infants having protective neutralising antibodies.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

PoliomyelitisPoliovirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBangladeshChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPoliovirus Vaccine, OralAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralPoliovirus Vaccine, Oral

Identifiers

PMID36495882
PMCPMC9860215
OpenAlexW4310828209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.