ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023
The Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model From the HoLISTIC Consortium.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of EBV status and histology on patient outcomes with nivolumab-AVD vs BV-AVD in advanced classic Hodgkin lymphoma (S1826).Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Constructing an External Control Arm Using the French REALYSA Cohort to Replicate Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Arm in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Novel Geriatric Risk Score for Prognostication in Older Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Validation of the advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma international prognostic index (A-HIPI) in the GHSG HD21 trial.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Integrated Clinical-Molecular Risk Stratification in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Machine Learning Survival Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Extranodal Organ Burden in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma with Extranodal Involvement: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of monocyte percentage and extranodal involvement in classical hodgkin lymphoma: A multicenter real-world study of 547 chinese patients.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of tumor bulk in modern management of common lymphoma subtypes: an Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry study.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of the Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Evolution of therapeutic paradigms in Hodgkin lymphoma: from "cure-oriented" to "functional cure".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Today.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of Spatial and Topological Features of Tumor Microenvironment in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- The importance of assessing the fitness of older patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- A noninvasive machine learning model using a complete blood count for screening of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Refining the risk stratification in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A critical analysis of clinical prediction models.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- An Individualized Prediction Model for Early-Stage Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma.NEJM evidence · 2025Article
- Predicting Absolute Risk of First Relapse in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma by Incorporating Contemporary Treatment Effects.Cancers · 2025Article
- Newly Diagnosed Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Optimizing Outcomes in a New Therapeutic Era.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
- Definitions and use of tumor bulk in phase 3 lymphoma trials: a comprehensive literature review.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Impact of Age on Biology, Presentation and Outcomes in Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study.Hematological oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe International Prognostic Score (IPS) has been used in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) for 25 years. However, analyses have documented suboptimal performance of the IPS among contemporarily treated patients. Harnessing multisource individual patient data from the Hodgkin Lymphoma International Study for Individual Care consortium, we developed and validated a modern clinical prediction model.
methodsModel development via Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines was performed on 4,022 patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage adult cHL from eight international phase III clinical trials, conducted from 1996 to 2014. External validation was performed on 1,431 contemporaneously treated patients from four real-world cHL registries. To consider association over a full range of continuous variables, we evaluated piecewise linear splines for potential nonlinear relationships. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.
resultsThe median age in the development cohort was 33 (18-65) years; nodular sclerosis was the most common histology. Kaplan-Meier estimators were 0.77 for 5-year PFS and 0.92 for 5-year OS. Significant predictor variables included age, sex, stage, bulk, absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and albumin, with slight variation for PFS versus OS. Moreover, age and absolute lymphocyte count yielded nonlinear relationships with outcomes. Optimism-corrected c-statistics in the development model for 5-year PFS and OS were 0.590 and 0.720, respectively. There was good discrimination and calibration in external validation and consistent performance in internal-external validation. Compared with the IPS, there was superior discrimination for OS and enhanced calibration for PFS and OS.
conclusionWe rigorously developed and externally validated a clinical prediction model in > 5,000 patients with advanced-stage cHL. Furthermore, we identified several novel nonlinear relationships and improved the prediction of patient outcomes. An online calculator was created for individualized point-of-care use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.