Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36495588›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

The Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model From the HoLISTIC Consortium.

Angie Mae Rodday, Susan K Parsons, Jenica N Upshaw, Jonathan W Friedberg, Andrea Gallamini, Eliza Hawkes, David Hodgson, Peter Johnson, Brian K Link, Eric Mou and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Today.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Angie Mae RoddayInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-3401
Susan K ParsonsInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0282-6490
Jenica N UpshawInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-5481
Jonathan W FriedbergJames P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Andrea GallaminiResearch and Clinical Innovation Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2054-7412
Eliza HawkesAustralasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0376-2559
David HodgsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-4582
Peter JohnsonFaculty of Medicine, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-4974
Brian K LinkDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-0698
Eric MouDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.ORCID 0000-0002-9865-4517
Kerry J SavageCentre for Lymphoid Cancer, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-9863
Pier Luigi ZinzaniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seragnoli" Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica Sperimentale Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-2651
Matthew MaurerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-0526
Andrew M EvensDivision of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-6900-1824

Funding

Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
The Role of Monocytes in non-Hodgkin LymphomaP50CA097274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEINER, GEORGE J. · 2002 to 2021
$45.7M
Rochester Network Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233230 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Paul M Barr · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
Modeling Multi-Source Data in Hodgkin LymphomaR01CA262265 · NCI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Andrew M Evens, Susan Kenyon Parsons · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
Prevention of Anthracycline Chemotherapy CardiotoxicityK08HL146959 · NHLBI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI UPSHAW, JENICA · 2020 to 2024
$885k
Cancer Research UK 9619NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097274NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262265NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233230NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL146959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe International Prognostic Score (IPS) has been used in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) for 25 years. However, analyses have documented suboptimal performance of the IPS among contemporarily treated patients. Harnessing multisource individual patient data from the Hodgkin Lymphoma International Study for Individual Care consortium, we developed and validated a modern clinical prediction model.

methodsModel development via Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines was performed on 4,022 patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage adult cHL from eight international phase III clinical trials, conducted from 1996 to 2014. External validation was performed on 1,431 contemporaneously treated patients from four real-world cHL registries. To consider association over a full range of continuous variables, we evaluated piecewise linear splines for potential nonlinear relationships. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsThe median age in the development cohort was 33 (18-65) years; nodular sclerosis was the most common histology. Kaplan-Meier estimators were 0.77 for 5-year PFS and 0.92 for 5-year OS. Significant predictor variables included age, sex, stage, bulk, absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and albumin, with slight variation for PFS versus OS. Moreover, age and absolute lymphocyte count yielded nonlinear relationships with outcomes. Optimism-corrected c-statistics in the development model for 5-year PFS and OS were 0.590 and 0.720, respectively. There was good discrimination and calibration in external validation and consistent performance in internal-external validation. Compared with the IPS, there was superior discrimination for OS and enhanced calibration for PFS and OS.

conclusionWe rigorously developed and externally validated a clinical prediction model in > 5,000 patients with advanced-stage cHL. Furthermore, we identified several novel nonlinear relationships and improved the prediction of patient outcomes. An online calculator was created for individualized point-of-care use.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseaseAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID36495588
PMCPMC10082254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.