Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36495384›Full record

Observational studyQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

An experience- and preference-based EQ-5D-3L value set derived using 18 months of longitudinal data in patients who sustained a fracture: results from the ICUROS.

Axel Svedbom, Fredrik Borgstöm, Emma Hernlund, Vidmantas Alekna, Maria Luisa Bianchi, Patricia Clark, Manuel Diaz-Curiel, Hans Peter Dimai, Mikk Jürisson, Olga Lesnyak and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 70% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 12 countries.

Axel SvedbomICON, Stockholm, Sweden. axel.svedbom@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2596-1679
Fredrik BorgstömLIME/MMC, Karolinska Institustet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma HernlundICON, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vidmantas AleknaFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Maria Luisa BianchiBone Metabolism Unit, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Patricia ClarkClinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Infantil Federico Gómez and Faculty of Medicine UNAM, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
Manuel Diaz-CurielServicio de Medicina Interna/Enfermedades Metabolicas Oseas, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Hans Peter DimaiDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Mikk JürissonFaculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Olga LesnyakNorth-West State Medical University Named After I.I.Mechnikov, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Eugene McCloskeyAcademic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Metabolic Bone and Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Kerrie M SandersDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Western Health and Sunshine Campus Melbourne University, Victoria, Australia.
Stuart SilvermanCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Marija TamulaitieneFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Thierry ThomasDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Saint-Etienne, INSERM U1059, Lyon University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Anna N A TostesonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, USA.
Bengt JönssonStockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
John A KanisDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Western Health and Sunshine Campus Melbourne University, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUVilnius University · LTCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESInserm · FRIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITKarolinska Institutet · SEMedical University of Graz · ATNorth-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov · RUStockholm School of Economics · SEUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

CONACyT El 2008-01-87106Estonian Ministry of Education and Research IUT 2-Estonian Ministry of Education and Research IUT 34-17Estonian Science Foundation 9368Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1the National Health and Medical Research Council 628422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEQ-5D-3L preference-based value sets are predominately based on hypothetical health states and derived in cross-sectional settings. Therefore, we derived an experience-based value set from a prospective observational study.

methodsThe International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic fractures Study (ICUROS) was a multinational study on fragility fractures, prospectively collecting EQ-5D-3L and Time trade-off (TTO) within two weeks after fracture (including pre-fracture recall), and at 4, 12, and 18 months thereafter. We derived an EQ-5D-3L value set by regressing the TTO values on the ten impairment levels in the EQ-5D-3L. We explored the potential for response shift and whether preferences for domains vary systematically with prior impairment in that domain. Finally, we compared the value set to 25 other EQ-5D-3L preference-based value sets.

resultsTTO data were available for 12,954 EQ-5D-3L health states in 4683 patients. All coefficients in the value set had the expected sign, were statistically significant, and increased monotonically with severity of impairment. We found evidence for response shift in mobility, self-care, and usual activities. The value set had good agreement with the only other experience- and preference-based value set, but poor agreement with all hypothetical value sets.

conclusionsWe present an experience- and preference-based value set with high face validity. The study indicates that response shift may be important to account for when deriving value sets. Furthermore, the study suggests that perspective (experienced versus hypothetical) is more important than country setting or demographics for valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states.

Indexed as

Health StatusOsteoporotic FracturesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesFractureHealth-Related Quality of LifeHealth UtilityOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID36495384
PMCPMC10063467
OpenAlexW4311018478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.