Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36495360›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023

Exploring the relationship between capillary refill time, skin blood flow and microcirculatory reactivity during early resuscitation of patients with septic shock: a pilot study.

Roberto Contreras, Glenn Hernández, Emilio Daniel Valenzuela, Cecilia González, Rodrigo Ulloa, Dagoberto Soto, Ricardo Castro, Camila Guzmán, Vanessa Oviedo, Leyla Alegría and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Roberto ContrerasDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Glenn HernándezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Emilio Daniel ValenzuelaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Cecilia GonzálezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo UlloaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Dagoberto SotoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Ricardo CastroDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Camila GuzmánDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Vanessa OviedoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Leyla AlegríaDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Diego VidalDepartamento de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingenieria, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sebastian MoralesDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-TascónDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Fundación Valle del Lili, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia.
Jan BakkerDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
Eduardo KattanDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile. e.kattan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1997-6893
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLFundación Valle del Lili · CO

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FONDECYT No 11201220Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FONDECYT No 1200246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capillary refill time (CRT), a costless and widely available tool, has emerged as a promising target to guide septic shock resuscitation. However, it has yet to gain universal acceptance due to its potential inter-observer variability. Standardization of CRT assessment may minimize this problem, but few studies have compared this approach with techniques that directly assess skin blood flow (SBF). Our objective was to determine if an abnormal CRT is associated with impaired SBF and microvascular reactivity in early septic shock patients. Twelve septic shock patients were subjected to multimodal perfusion and hemodynamic monitoring for 24 h. Three time-points (0, 1, and 24 h) were registered for each patient. SBF was measured by laser doppler. We performed a baseline SBF measurement and two microvascular reactivity tests: one with a thermal challenge at 44 °C and other with a vascular occlusion test. Ten healthy volunteers were evaluated to obtain reference values. The patients (median age 70 years) exhibited a 28-day mortality of 50%. Baseline CRT was 3.3 [2.7-7.3] seconds. In pooled data analysis, abnormal CRT presented a significantly lower SBF when compared to normal CRT [44 (13.3-80.3) vs 193.2 (99.4-285) APU, p = 0.0001]. CRT was strongly associated with SBF (R

Indexed as

Shock, SepticAgedHemodynamicsHumansMicrocirculationPilot ProjectsResuscitationCapillary refill timeHemodynamicsLactateSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID36495360
OpenAlexW4311019064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.