Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36495186›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023

A systematic review of the sex differences in risk factors for knee osteoarthritis.

Ingrid A Szilagyi, Jan H Waarsing, Joyce B J van Meurs, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Dieuwke Schiphof

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sexual Dimorphism in Clinical Manifestations of Knee Osteoarthritis.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Osteoarthritis as a systemic disease.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid A SzilagyiDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-3936
Jan H WaarsingDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce B J van MeursDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieuwke SchiphofDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious systematic reviews focused on the evidence of common risk factors for knee OA (KOA); however, the effect and strength of association between risk factors and KOA might be different between the two sexes. The aim of the present systematic review was to determine the current evidence on sex differences in the association between risk factors and KOA and their prevalence.

methodsWe searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Web of Science. A methodological quality assessment was conducted independently by two researchers according to an adapted version of the standardized set of criteria known as the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). The NOS, a star system, was converted to three categories of quality.

resultsIn total, 27 studies reported sex-specific risk estimates on several risk factors for KOA. Out of the 22 longitudinal cohort studies (except one nested case-control), 12 were of good quality and 10 were of fair quality. The five cross-sectional studies consisted of one of good, three of fair and one of poor quality. There was an indication of sex differences in risk factors leading to higher risk of KOA: high BMI, alcohol consumption, atherosclerosis and high vitamin E levels in women, and high physical activity, soft drink consumption and abdominal obesity in men. Knee injury, high blood pressure and low step rate seem to affect both women and men.

conclusionMore good quality studies are needed to assess sex differences in risk factors for KOA, especially for symptomatic/clinical OA.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsSex Characteristicsclinicalknee OAradiographicrisk factorssex differencessymptomaticsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36495186
PMCPMC10234207
OpenAlexW4311021031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.