ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023
Multi-Omics Studies in Historically Excluded Populations: The Road to Equity.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Integrative Mapping of Regulatory Variation in African American Hepatocytes Using Colocalization and MPRA: Toward Precision Drug Response.Research square · 2026Article
- Assessing long-term pleiotropic effects of potential novel triglyceride-lowering medications using variants identified by Mendelian randomization.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Local ancestry-informed GWAS of warfarin dose requirement in African Americans identifies a CYP2C19 splicing QTL.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Methodological opportunities in genomic data analysis to advance health equity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- A roadmap to precision medicine through post-genomic electronic medical records.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues.Human genomics · 2025Review
- TEMR: Trans-ethnic mendelian randomization method using large-scale GWAS summary datasets.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Increased accrual of diverse patient populations in oncology phase I clinical trials at the University of Colorado Cancer Center.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Building an Ethical and Trustworthy Biomedical AI Ecosystem for the Translational and Clinical Integration of Foundation Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Untargeted metabolomic profiling reveals molecular signatures associated with type 2 diabetes in Nigerians.Genome medicine · 2024Article
- Advancing equity in human genomics through tissue-specific multi-ancestry molecular data.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Overlap in synaptic neurological condition susceptibility pathways and the neural pannexin 1 interactome revealed by bioinformatics analyses.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past few decades, genomewide association studies (GWASs) have identified the specific genetics variants contributing to many complex diseases by testing millions of genetic variations across the human genome against a variety of phenotypes. However, GWASs are limited in their ability to uncover mechanistic insight given that most significant associations are found in non-coding region of the genome. Furthermore, the lack of diversity in studies has stymied the advance of precision medicine for many historically excluded populations. In this review, we summarize most popular multi-omics approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) related to precision medicine and highlight if diverse populations have been included and how their findings have advance biological understanding of disease and drug response. New methods that incorporate local ancestry have been to improve the power of GWASs for admixed populations (such as African Americans and Latinx). Because most signals from GWAS are in the non-coding region, other machine learning and omics approaches have been developed to identify the potential causative single-nucleotide polymorphisms and genes that explain these phenotypes. These include polygenic risk scores, expression quantitative trait locus mapping, and transcriptome-wide association studies. Analogous protein methods, such as proteins quantitative trait locus mapping, proteome-wide association studies, and metabolomic approaches provide insight into the consequences of genetic variation on protein abundance. Whereas, integrated multi-omics studies have improved our understanding of the mechanisms for genetic association, we still lack the datasets and cohorts for historically excluded populations to provide equity in precision medicine and pharmacogenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.