ArticleInternational journal of laboratory hematology2023
Lupus anticoagulants as a prospective independent predictor in COVID-19 patients.
Article in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lupus anticoagulants as a prospective independent predictor in COVID-19 patients.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLupus anticoagulant (LA) are commonly detected during SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the relationship between LA and clinical significance is still unclear.
methodsA retrospective chart analysis was performed on COVID-19 patients who were tested for LA at our hospital from March 2020 to November 2021. We analyzed the patient's characteristics based on the result of the LA test. In addition, subgroup analysis performed the LA-positive group who had undergone serial LA tests.
resultsA total of 219 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study, 148 patients (67.6%) were positive for LA test. The LA-positive group received more treatment of high flow nasal cannula (LA-positive 73.0%, LA-negative 57.7%, p = 0.024). The LA-positive group showed prolonged aPTT, higher levels of CRP and fibrinogen (all p's < 0.05). Among 148 LA-positive patients, 127 patients (86.5%) were found to be LA-positive within 10 days of SARS-CoV-2 positive, and LA-positive group confirmed a median time to LA loss of 10 days. However, there was a group that was negative for LA in the early stages of infection and became positive about 13 days later. A subgroup analysis showed that these patients had different characteristics due to their longer hospital stays and higher D-dimer levels.
conclusionsIn COVID-19 patients, LA is expected to be associated to disease severity. Since the clinical significance of LA is different depending on the onset time of LA positivity, the LA test is suggested to be done at diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, even if LA is negative, follow-up test should be considered within 10 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.