ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2022
Gold nanoparticle delivery to solid tumors: a multiparametric study on particle size and the tumor microenvironment.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inorganic Nanomaterials can Promote or Inhibit Tumor Metastasis Depending on Tumor Microenvironment Composition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Drug Delivery System Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblast for Improving Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticle (NP) delivery to solid tumors remains an actively studied field, where several recent studies have shed new insights into the underlying mechanisms and the still overall poor efficacy. In the present study, Au NPs of different sizes were used as model systems to address this topic, where delivery of the systemically administered NPs to the tumor as a whole or to tumor cells specifically was examined in view of a broad range of tumor-associated parameters. Using non-invasive imaging combined with histology, immunohistochemistry, single-cell spatial RNA expression and image-based single cell cytometry revealed a size-dependent complex interaction of multiple parameters that promoted tumor and tumor-cell specific NP delivery. Interestingly, the data show that most NPs are sequestered by tumor-associated macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts, while only few NPs reach the actual tumor cells. While perfusion is important, leaky blood vessels were found not to promote NP delivery, but rather that delivery efficacy correlated with the maturity level of tumor-associated blood vessels. In line with recent studies, we found that the presence of specialized endothelial cells, expressing high levels of CD276 and Plvap promoted both tumor delivery and tumor cell-specific delivery of NPs. This study identifies several parameters that can be used to determine the suitability of NP delivery to the tumor region or to tumor cells specifically, and enables personalized approaches for maximal delivery of nanoformulations to the targeted tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.