ArticleBMC psychiatry2022
A case report involving the experience of pervasive pregnancy denial: detailed observation of the first 12 postpartum weeks.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pregnancy Denial: Toward a New Understanding of the Underlying Mechanisms.Current psychiatry reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPervasive pregnancy denial is a rare condition associated with distress and unassisted delivery. CASE PRESENTATION: The case involves a 38-year-old woman (NN), with two older children (ages 8 and 11), who was unaware, until delivery, that she had been pregnant. The case is discussed in the context of a 12-week observation of postpartum mood, stress, and mother-child attachment. NN and other 558 non-depressed women (mean age 32.41 years) were selected from the pool of participants in the RIPOD (risk of postpartum depression) study. All participants were recruited within 1-6 days of delivery. In addition to surveying depressed mood at childbirth, remote assessments of mood, mother-child attachment, and perceived stress were conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks postpartum. Every other day, the participants also reported their current perceived stress levels based on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high). During the entire period of postpartum observation, NN reported no symptoms on the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, similar to only 1.6% of the sample, no stress as 0.7% of the sample, and above-average mother-infant bonding akin to only 4.6% of the sample. Her daily stress levels showed no disturbance, which was the case for only 3.32% of the total sample. On the day of delivery, NN reported a stress level of 1 (the minimum possible level), which was reported by only 4.2% of the total sample. However, NN reported the experience of delivery to be traumatic given that the child had fallen to the floor.
conclusionThe experience of a denied pregnancy did not appear to disturb NN at any time point, not even on the day of delivery. Compared to NN, the other non-depressed participants reported wide fluctuations in stress levels during the observation period. NN did not report any risk factors for denied pregnancy. Thus, she belonged neither to any group of typical pregnancy deniers, as reported in the literature, nor to a typical postpartum group. We postulate, therefore, that the extent to which pregnancy denial can be deemed a normal variation, unrelated to a psychological or physiological condition, depends largely on personal traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.