ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2022
Self-assessed visual function outcome in cataract surgery: minimum important difference of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to study the minimum important difference (MID) of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in cataract surgery.
methodsA nationwide multi-center prospective randomized study was conducted using the Swedish National Cataract Register and the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Randomized patients (n = 400) who had completed the Catquest-9SF before surgery and three months after surgery were sent an anchor question on self-assessed change in visual function after cataract surgery 14 days after the postoperative Catquest-9SF. Rasch analysis was performed on the preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF questionnaires, and the patients were dichotomized with regard to their preoperative Rasch score. The MID range of the two groups was calculated based on the anchor question, and the anchor question based MID was then estimated in a scatter plot. The MID was also estimated based on distribution by calculating Cohen's effect size.
resultsThe analyses included 231 patients who had completed the Catquest-9SF on both occasions as well as the questionnaire with the anchor question. The group with better preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 0.5 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.07. The group with worse preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 1.80 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.46.
conclusionThis article contributes detailed knowledge of the MID of Catquest-9SF, enabling even more accurate high-quality evaluation of the outcome and benefit of cataract surgery worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.