Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494740›Full record

ReviewInflammation and regeneration2022

State-of-the-art liver disease research using liver-on-a-chip.

Sayaka Deguchi, Kazuo Takayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammation and regeneration, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mouse Models for the Study of Liver Fibrosis RegressionJournal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sayaka DeguchiCenter for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kazuo TakayamaCenter for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. kazuo.takayama@cira.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1132-2457

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 21gm1610005h0001Japan Science and Technology Corporation JPMJAX222A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand disease pathophysiologies, models that recapitulate human functions are necessary. In vitro models that consist of human cells are preferred to ones using animal cells, because organ functions can vary from species to species. However, conventional in vitro models do not recapitulate human organ functions well. Organ-on-a-chip technology provides a reliable in vitro model of the functional units of human organs. Organ-on-a-chip technology uses microfluidic devices and their accessories to impart organ functions to human cells. Using microfluidic devices, we can co-culture multiple cell types that compose human organs. Moreover, we can culture human cells under physiologically relevant stresses, such as mechanical and shear stresses. Current organ-on-a-chip technology can reproduce the functions of several organs including the liver. Because it is difficult to maintain the function of human hepatocytes, which are the gold standard of in vitro liver models, under conventional culture conditions, the application of liver-on-a-chips to liver disease research is expected. This review introduces the current status and future prospects of liver-on-a-chips in liver disease research.

Indexed as

Alcoholic liver diseasesDrug-induced liver injuriesHepatic zonationInfectious liver diseasesLiver-on-a-chipNAFLD/NASHOrgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID36494740
PMCPMC9733013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.