Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494736›Full record

ArticleBioPsychoSocial medicine2022

Multimodal pain therapy for persistent idiopathic facial pain - a pilot study.

Zita Foerster, Barbara Kleinmann, Nadine Schlueter, Kirstin Vach, Tilman Wolter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioPsychoSocial medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multimodal Approaches in the Treatment of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathy-Evidence from Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zita FoersterInterdisciplinary Pain Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str, 10779106, Freiburg, Germany.
Barbara KleinmannInterdisciplinary Pain Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str, 10779106, Freiburg, Germany.
Nadine SchlueterDivision for Cariology, Department for operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str, 10779106, Freiburg, Germany.
Kirstin VachInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str, 10779106, Freiburg, Germany.
Tilman WolterInterdisciplinary Pain Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str, 10779106, Freiburg, Germany. tilman.wolter@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-3381
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePersistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP) is a pain syndrome with missing evidence-based therapy recommendations. According to the biopsychosocial pain model, multidisciplinary pain treatment (MPT) offers a promising therapeutic option for chronic pain syndromes. MPT is an interprofessional treatment procedure, consisting of medical, physiotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic treatment units, which has not yet been studied in PIFP.

methodsThis retrospective study included 25 patients with PIFP, who had been treated with MPT. Pain intensity on the numerical rating scale (NRS), perceived disability, habitual well-being, as well as anxiety/depression and stress scales were recorded. Moreover, the patients evaluated the efficacy of each type of the single therapeutic interventions.

resultsThere was a highly significant decrease in the characteristic pain intensity. Also habitual well-being improved significantly, as did anxiety and depression. The perceived disability and stress also improved, but without statistical significance. Physiotherapy was rated as the most effective therapeutic unit. Among the medical measures, consultations took first place (40% of the participants). Nearly three-fourths of the patients (72%) would recommend MPT.

conclusionThe present study shows beneficial outcomes in patients with PIFP following MPT. Patients evaluate physiotherapeutic treatment as particularly efficacious. Therefore, MPT can be considered as a therapeutic option in patients with PIFP.

Indexed as

Chronic painMultidisciplinary pain treatmentPersistent idiopathic facial pain

Identifiers

PMID36494736
PMCPMC9733036
OpenAlexW4311280442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.