Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494733›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Exploring alternative financing models and early access schemes for orphan drugs: a Belgian case study.

Khadidja Abdallah, Kathleen Claes, Isabelle Huys, Lennert Follon, Charlotte Calis, Steven Simoens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khadidja AbdallahDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2 Bus 521, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. khadidja.abdallah@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-9213
Kathleen ClaesNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Isabelle HuysDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2 Bus 521, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Lennert FollonDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2 Bus 521, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Charlotte CalisDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2 Bus 521, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Steven SimoensDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2 Bus 521, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough some jurisdictions have implemented particular adjustments to accommodate often-expensive orphan drugs in their healthcare systems, availability of these drugs remains complex. This study investigates alternative financing models and early access schemes for orphan drugs in the context of the Belgian healthcare system.

methodsThree focus group discussions were held with a panel of eleven experts from the Belgian Drug Reimbursement Committee, the Colleges for Orphan Drugs, the pharmaceutical industry, physicians, ethicists and pharmacists. Retrieved data were pseudonymised, analysed and coded according to the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.

resultsExperts disfavoured the insulated fund as well as private insurance for financing orphan drugs, as, respectively, isolation of a separate budget and a mostly profit-driven mechanism would contradict the Belgian fundamental principle of solidarity. Moreover, an insulated fund could, albeit on a smaller scale, reproduce the same budgetary constraints as the general reimbursement system. As the Special Solidarity Fund is intended for urgent care and exclusively accommodates financial needs subject to eligibility criteria, its design would not allow general financing of orphan drugs. Overall, implementation of an alternative financing model was not endorsed, instead, improving the current reimbursement system was preferred. Suggestions mentioned were; increased collaboration and transparency, robust and quality real-world evidence but also digitalization of data. Alleviating administrative burden and simplifying the admission process of compassionate use program, medical need program and early treatment reimbursement should be prioritized to facilitate early access. Furthermore, a legal framework for off-label use could stimulate proper implementation. Efforts on collaboration of expertise centres and coordination of orphan drug databases across Europe could foster a robust data network to support orphan drug availability in individual countries.

conclusionsThis research reveals that reassessing current financing models and early access schemes by eliminating inadequacies, may be more conducive than establishing alternative systems to increase availability of orphan drugs in Belgium. Other jurisdictions may rely on this information to review their own models of early access and financing to cultivate a more sustainable delivery of orphan drugs.

Indexed as

Orphan Drug ProductionRare DiseasesBelgiumDrug IndustryEuropeHumansCompassionate useEarly access schemesFinancing modelsInsulated fundMedical needOff-label usePrivate insurance

Identifiers

PMID36494733
PMCPMC9733299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.