Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494719›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Cancer prevention in females with and without obesity: Does perceived and internalised weight bias determine cancer prevention behaviour?

Marie Bernard, Magrit Löbner, Florian Lordick, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Claudia Luck-Sikorski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Decomposing Oral Cancer Screening Inequalities Across Wealth Index among Indian Women Aged 30-49 Years: Findings From National Family Health Survey-5.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marie BernardMedical Faculty, Institute of Medical Sociology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Salle), Germany. marie.bernard@medizin.uni-halle.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-4057
Magrit LöbnerMedical Faculty, Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Florian LordickLeipzig University Cancer Center, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Anja Mehnert-TheuerkaufDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerMedical Faculty, Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Claudia Luck-SikorskiIntegrated Research and Treatment Centre AdiposityDiseases (IFB), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEBern University of Applied Sciences · CHHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EO1501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with obesity are not only at higher risk of developing cancer such as gynaecological malignancies but are also less likely to attend cancer prevention screenings (CPS). In this study, we aimed to obtain a better database for Germany and to investigate whether women with obesity are less likely to undergo CPS compared to women without obesity. Moreover, we aimed to identify factors that determine CPS behaviour.

methodsA quantitative cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted that assessed data of 1003 females in the general public with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m

resultsWomen with obesity were less likely to undergo Pap smear (χ

conclusionAlthough data did not suggest that internalised or perceived weight bias deter women with obesity from undergoing CPS, the role of weight bias has not yet been conclusively clarified. Future studies should address potential methodological limitations and evaluate the effectiveness of most recently established cancer prevention programs and in particular how they affect CPS behaviour in women with obesity.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsWeight PrejudiceCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansObesityPapanicolaou TestCancer preventionObesityStigmaWeight bias internalisation

Identifiers

PMID36494719
PMCPMC9733287
OpenAlexW4311678142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.