Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494670›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

IMPLANT: a new technique for transgene copy number estimation in plants using a single end-point PCR reaction.

Jonas De Saeger, Jihae Park, Kai Thoris, Charlotte De Bruyn, Hoo Sun Chung, Dirk Inzé, Stephen Depuydt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic consequences associated with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jonas De SaegerLaboratory of Plant Growth Analysis, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 406-840, South Korea. Jonas.de.saeger@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-3895
Jihae ParkLaboratory of Plant Growth Analysis, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 406-840, South Korea.
Kai ThorisLaboratory of Plant Growth Analysis, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 406-840, South Korea.
Charlotte De BruynLaboratory of Plant Growth Analysis, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 406-840, South Korea.
Hoo Sun ChungDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk InzéDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Stephen DepuydtLaboratory of Plant Growth Analysis, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 406-840, South Korea.
Ghent University · BEGhent University Global Campus · KRIncheon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number determination is one of the first steps in the characterization of transgenic plant lines. The classical approach to this, Southern blotting, is time-consuming, expensive and requires massive amounts of high-quality genomic DNA. Other PCR-based techniques are either inaccurate, laborious, or expensive.

resultsHere, we propose a new technique, IMPLANT (Insertion of competitive PCR calibrator for copy number estimation), a competitive PCR-based technique in which the competitor (based on an endogenous gene) is also incorporated in the T-DNA, which then gets integrated in the genome together with the gene of interest. As the number of integrated competitor molecules directly corresponds to the number of transgene copies, the transgene copy number can be determined by a single PCR reaction. We demonstrate that the results of this technique closely correspond with those obtained by segregation analysis in Arabidopsis and digital PCR In rice, indicating that it is a powerful alternative for other techniques for copy number determination.

conclusionsWe show that this technique is not only reliable, but is also faster, easier, and cheaper as compared with other techniques. Accurate results are obtained in both Arabidopsis and rice, but this technique can be easily extended to other organisms and as such can be widely adopted in the field of biotechnology.

Indexed as

Competitive PCRCopy number determinationGenetically modified plantsIMPLANTT-DNA insertions

Identifiers

PMID36494670
PMCPMC9732982
OpenAlexW4311282534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.