ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2022
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with previously treated malignancies: diagnostic performance and predictive value.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Refining Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging with Bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA: Evidence from a Regional Romanian Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Clinical Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) in the Evaluation of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is a minimally invasive and effective sampling approach for patients with mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy. Increased recognition of the ultrasonographic features revealed the value of its images in predicting mediastinal lymph node malignancy. However, its diagnostic validity and the predictive value of its ultrasonographic features have not been demonstrated well in patients after systemic anti-tumor therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with suspicious lymph nodes after anti-tumor therapy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed cases of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration performed between January 2019 and August 2021 at a single tertiary hospital center. Patients with suspected mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes within 5 years of systemic anti-tumor therapy were enrolled. Final diagnoses were determined by pathologic diagnoses of samples from transbronchial needle aspiration, surgery, or follow-up for at least 6 months. Ultrasonographic features were analyzed to assess the predictive value of malignant lymph nodes after treatment.
resultsOverall, 168 lymph nodes of 138 patients were analyzed. Among 110 (65.5%) malignant lymph nodes, 75 originated from lung cancers; the other 35 were from other malignancies. No complications related to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration were observed. Of 58 negative results of transbronchial needle aspiration, 51 were proven to be true negatives; 7 were false. The overall sensitivity and the negative predictive value were 94.02% and 87.93%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed the absence of central hilar structure and short axis > 10 mm as independent predictive factors for malignancy.
conclusionsEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration performs satisfactorily in diagnosing mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy even after anti-tumor treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.