Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494655›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

Starting a Swedish national quality registry for orthognathic surgery: a tool for auditing fundamentals of care.

Mats Sjöström, Bodil Lund, Bo Sunzel, Martin Bengtsson, Mikael Magnusson, Lars Rasmusson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of 3D planning in orthognathic surgery.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mats SjöströmOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. mats.sjostrom@umu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-1498
Bodil LundDepartment of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bo SunzelDep Oral and Maxillofacial surgery Public Dental health Växjö, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Martin BengtssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mikael MagnussonDepartment of Specialist Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Colloseum and Smile AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars RasmussonDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Sahlgrenska Academy and hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational quality registries (NQRs) provide open data for user-directed acquisition. National Quality Registry (NQR) data are often used to analyze the rates of treatment success and adverse events for studies that aim to improve treatment quality and patient satisfaction. Thus, NQRs promote the goal of achieving evidence-based therapies. However, the scientific literature seldom focuses on the complex process of initiating, designing, and implementing an NQR. Starting an NQR may be particularly challenging in a setting where specialized care is decentralized, such as orthognathic surgery in Sweden. The present study describes the initiation and early phases of a new NQR for orthognathic surgery in Sweden.

methodsThe initial inventory phase included gaining knowledge on regulations, creating economic plans, and identifying pitfalls in existing NQRs. Next, a crude framework for the registry was achieved. Outcome measures were selected with a nation-wide questionnaire, followed by a Delphi-like process for selecting parameters to include in the NQR. Our inclusive process comprised a stepwise introduction, feedback-based modifications, and preparatory educational efforts. Descriptive data were collected, based on the first 2 years (2018-2019) of registry operation.

resultsTwo years after implementation, 862 patients that underwent 1320 procedures were registered. This number corresponded to a 91% coverage rate. Bimaxillary treatments predominated, and the most common were a Le Fort I osteotomy combined with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (n = 275). Reoperations were conducted in 32 patients (3.6%), and the rate of patient satisfaction was 95%.

conclusionsA National Quality Registry should preferentially be started and maintained by an appointed task force of active clinicians. A collaborative, transparent, inclusive process may be an important factor for achieving credibility and high coverage, particularly in a decentralized setting.

Indexed as

Orthognathic SurgeryHumansOsteotomy, Le FortQuality ImprovementRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenLaunching patient registryNational patient registryOrthognathic surgeryQuality registry

Identifiers

PMID36494655
PMCPMC9732981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.