Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494652›Full record

ReviewBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery.

Daniel P Berthold, Lukas N Muench, Felix Dyrna, Augustus D Mazzocca, Patrick Garvin, Andreas Voss, Bastian Scheiderer, Sebastian Siebenlist, Andreas B Imhoff, Knut Beitzel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07399834 (Comparison of Single Tunnel Versus Double Tunnel Techniques for Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries, A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07399834 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Single Tunnel Versus Double Tunnel Techniques for Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries, A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, ThailandRan2025 to 2027Enrolled74ConditionsAC Joint DislocationArmsCoracoclavicular stabilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel P BertholdDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. daniel.berthold@tum.de.
Lukas N MuenchDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Felix DyrnaDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster, Munich, Germany.
Augustus D MazzoccaMassachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Patrick GarvinMassachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Andreas VossDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Bastian ScheidererDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian SiebenlistDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Knut BeitzelArthroscopy and Orthopedic Sportsmedicine, ATOS Orthoparc Clinic, Cologne, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · USInstitute for Sports Medicine · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. MAIN BODY: Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability.

conclusionFuture research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular JointJoint DislocationsJoint InstabilityArthroplastyClavicleHumansSuturesAC jointAcromioclavicular jointAcromioclavicular joint reconstructionAnatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstructionHorizontal instabilityVertical instability

Identifiers

PMID36494652
PMCPMC9733089
OpenAlexW4311674787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.