Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494645›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

Accurate detection for dental implant and peri-implant tissue by transfer learning of faster R-CNN: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Woo Sung Jang, Sunjai Kim, Pill Sang Yun, Han Sol Jang, You Won Seong, Hee Soo Yang, Jae-Seung Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Advanced deep learning techniques for recognition of dental implants.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Woo Sung JangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Sunjai KimDepartment of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Korea.
Pill Sang YunDepartment of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Korea.
Han Sol JangDepartment of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Korea.
You Won SeongGraduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hee Soo YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Seung ChangDepartment of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Korea. JSCHANG@yuhs.ac.

Funding

the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education 2021R1I1A1A01052695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of dental implants and the periapical tissues using periapical radiographs is crucial. Recently, artificial intelligence has shown a rapid advancement in the field of radiographic imaging. PURPOSE: This study attempted to detect dental implants and peri-implant tissues by using a deep learning method known as object detection on the implant image of periapical radiographs.

methodsAfter implant treatment, the periapical images were collected and data were processed by labeling the dental implant and peri-implant tissue together in the images. Next, 300 images of the periapical radiographs were split into 80:20 ratio (i.e. 80% of the data were used for training the model while 20% were used for testing the model). These were evaluated using an object detection model known as Faster R-CNN, which simultaneously performs classification and localization. This model was evaluated on the classification performance using metrics, including precision, recall, and F1 score. Additionally, in order to assess the localization performance, an evaluation through intersection over union (IoU) was utilized, and, Average Precision (AP) was used to assess both the classification and localization performance.

resultsConsidering the classification performance, precision = 0.977, recall = 0.992, and F1 score = 0.984 were derived. The indicator of localization was derived as mean IoU = 0.907. On the other hand, considering the indicators of both classification and localization performance, AP showed an object detection level of AP@0.5 = 0.996 and AP@0.75 = 0.967.

conclusionThus, the implementation of Faster R-CNN model for object detection on 300 periapical radiographic images including dental implants, resulted in high-quality object detection for dental implants and peri-implant tissues.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningPeriapical TissueRadiographyDental ImplantsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnostic imagingDigital radiographImplant failurePeri-implantitis

Identifiers

PMID36494645
PMCPMC9737962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.