Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494595›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2023

Sex hormones in SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility: key players or confounders?

Nicola Lott, Caroline E Gebhard, Susan Bengs, Achi Haider, Gabriela M Kuster, Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, Catherine Gebhard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic variants inFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Impact of sex and gender on post-COVID-19 syndrome, Switzerland, 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing the Potential Role of Cats (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicola LottDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Caroline E GebhardIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Susan BengsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Achi HaiderDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-4473
Gabriela M KusterDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Vera Regitz-ZagrosekCharité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-3467
Catherine GebhardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. catherine.gebhard@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-5822
University of Zurich · CHGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHarvard University · USUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has a clear sex disparity in clinical outcomes. Hence, the interaction between sex hormones, virus entry receptors and immune responses has attracted major interest as a target for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections. This Review summarizes the current understanding of the roles of androgens, oestrogens and progesterone in the regulation of virus entry receptors and disease progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as their therapeutic value. Although many experimental and clinical studies have analysed potential mechanisms by which female sex hormones might provide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, there is currently no clear evidence for a sex-specific expression of virus entry receptors. In addition, reports describing an influence of oestrogen, progesterone and androgens on the course of COVID-19 vary widely. Current data also do not support the administration of oestradiol in COVID-19. The conflicting evidence and lack of consensus results from a paucity of mechanistic studies and clinical trials reporting sex-disaggregated data. Further, the influence of variables beyond biological factors (sex), such as sociocultural factors (gender), on COVID-19 manifestations has not been investigated. Future research will have to fill this knowledge gap as the influence of sex and gender on COVID-19 will be essential to understanding and managing the long-term consequences of this pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AndrogensFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleProgesteroneReceptors, VirusAndrogensGonadal Steroid HormonesProgesteroneReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID36494595
PMCPMC9734735
OpenAlexW4311285716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.