ArticleScientific reports2022
Differentially expressed long noncoding RNAs in RAW264.7 macrophages during Brucella infection and functional analysis on the bacterial intracellular replication.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal and perinatal infectious morbidity in term prelabor rupture of membrane according to two induction of labor protocols.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Hidden Regulators: The Impact of lncRNAs on Zoonoses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of functional RNA molecules without protein-coding potential and play vital roles in majority of biological processes. To date, the expression profiles of lncRNAs and their influence on Brucella replication in RAW264.7 cells are poorly understood. In this study, we performed high-throughput transcriptome analysis to investigate the differentially expressed lncRNAs associated with Brucella abortus S2308 infection. Of these, 8, 6, 130 and 94 cellular lncRNAs were differentially expressed at 4, 8, 24 and 48 h post-infection, respectively. Moreover, 1918 protein-coding genes are predicted as potential cis target genes of differentially expressed lncRNAs by searching protein-coding genes located at upstream and downstream of lncRNA loci on the chromosome DNA of Mus musculus. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses indicated that majority of lncRNA target genes were associated with B. abortus infection. Fourteen lncRNAs from transcriptome data were selected for qRT-PCR verification, confirming 13 were differentially expressed. Animal experiments revealed three were differentially expressed in vivo by qRT-PCR analysis. Furthermore, knockdown of LNC_000428 by CRISPR/dCas9 inhibition or Locked Nucleic Acids transfection downregulated Tnfrsf8 expression at mRNA level and increased Brucella intracellular replication. Thus, we provide a novel evidence that lncRNAs induced by Brucella-infection function on Brucella intracellular replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.