Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494449›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

The neurobiological basis of affect is consistent with psychological construction theory and shares a common neural basis across emotional categories.

Doğa Gündem, Jure Potočnik, François-Laurent De Winter, Amal El Kaddouri, Daphne Stam, Ronald Peeters, Louise Emsell, Stefan Sunaert, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Mathieu Vandenbulcke and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From seeing to showing: towards a neuroscience of emotion production.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Representation of Fear Experience Is Shaped by Context.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Conceptual structure of emotions.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Doğa GündemNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-6551
Jure PotočnikNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
François-Laurent De WinterNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Amal El KaddouriNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daphne StamNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0962-5296
Ronald PeetersDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Louise EmsellNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-4158
Stefan SunaertDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lukas Van OudenhoveLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-3113
Mathieu VandenbulckeNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lisa Feldman BarrettDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4478-2051
Jan Van den StockNeuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. jan.vandenstock@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-3195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective experience colours everyday perception and cognition, yet its fundamental and neurobiological basis is poorly understood. The current debate essentially centers around the communalities and specificities across individuals, events, and emotional categories like anger, sadness, and happiness. Using fMRI during the experience of these emotions, we critically compare the two dominant conflicting theories on human affect. Basic emotion theory posits emotions as discrete universal entities generated by dedicated emotion category-specific neural circuits, while psychological construction theory claims emotional events as unique, idiosyncratic, and constructed by psychological primitives like core affect and conceptualization, which underlie each emotional event and operate in a predictive framework. Based on the findings of 8 a priori-defined model-specific prediction tests on the neural response amplitudes and patterns, we conclude that the neurobiological basis of affect is primarily characterized by idiosyncratic mechanisms and a common neural basis shared across emotion categories, consistent with psychological construction theory. The findings provide further insight into the organizational principles of the neural basis of affect and brain function in general. Future studies in clinical populations with affective symptoms may reveal the corresponding underlying neural changes from a psychological construction perspective.

Indexed as

EmotionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingCognitionHumans

Identifiers

PMID36494449
PMCPMC9734184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.