ArticleScientific reports2022
The usefulness of presepsin in the diagnosis of postoperative infectious complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic efficacy of serum presepsin for postoperative infectious complications: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Presepsin as a Novel Biomarker in Abdominal Sepsis: Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Presepsin Outperforms Conventional Inflammatory Markers in Distinguishing Malignant from Benign Cervical Lymphadenopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The usefulness of presepsin in the early detection of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective study aimed to evaluate presepsin use as a biomarker of on postoperative infectious complications after gastrectomy, compared to C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells (WBCs), and neutrophils (Neuts). Overall, 108 patients were enrolled between October 2019 and December 2020. Presepsin, CRP, WBC, and Neut levels were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 5, and 7, using a postoperative morbidity survey. Grade II or higher infectious complications occurred in 18 patients (16.6%). Presepsin levels on all evaluated PODs were significantly higher in the infectious complication group than in the non-complication group (p = 0.002, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.025, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) values were the highest for presepsin on PODs 3 and 7 (0.89 and 0.77, respectively) and similar to that of CRP, with a high value > 0.8 (0.86) on POD 5. For presepsin, the optimal cut-off values were 298 pg/mL (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 83.3%), 278 pg/mL (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 82.2%), and 300 pg/mL (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 82%) on PODs 3, 5, and 7, respectively. Presepsin levels on PODs 3, 5, and 7 after gastrectomy is a more useful biomarker of postoperative infectious complications compared to CRP, WBCs, and Neuts, with a high sensitivity and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.