Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The absence of an invasive air sac system in the earliest dinosaurs suggests multiple origins of vertebral pneumaticity.

Tito Aureliano, Aline M Ghilardi, Rodrigo T Müller, Leonardo Kerber, Flávio A Pretto, Marcelo A Fernandes, Fresia Ricardi-Branco, Mathew J Wedel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Avian air sacs and neopulmo: their evolution, form and function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. The influence of soft tissue volume on estimates of skeletal pneumaticity: implications for fossil archosaurs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tito AurelianoInstitute of Geosciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil. aureliano.tito@gmail.com.
Aline M GhilardiDiversity, Ichnology and Osteohistology Laboratory (DINOlab), Department of Geology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte (URFN), Natal, Brazil.
Rodrigo T MüllerCentro de Apoio À Pesquisa Paleontológica da Quarta Colônia (CAPPA), Federal University of Santa Maria (CAPPA/UFSM), São João Do Polêsine, Brazil.
Leonardo KerberCentro de Apoio À Pesquisa Paleontológica da Quarta Colônia (CAPPA), Federal University of Santa Maria (CAPPA/UFSM), São João Do Polêsine, Brazil.
Flávio A PrettoCentro de Apoio À Pesquisa Paleontológica da Quarta Colônia (CAPPA), Federal University of Santa Maria (CAPPA/UFSM), São João Do Polêsine, Brazil.
Marcelo A FernandesLaboratório de Paleoecologia E Paleoicnologia (LPP), Departamento de Ecologia E Biologia Evolutiva (DEBE), Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Fresia Ricardi-BrancoInstitute of Geosciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil.
Mathew J WedelCollege of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific and College of Podiatric Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRWestern University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 422568/2018-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico CNPq 307333/2021-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico CNPq 404095/2021-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2019/16727-3) 'Taphonomical landscapes'Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 21/2551-0000619-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 21/2551-0000680-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul FAPERGS 1/2551-0002030-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of the air sac system present in birds has been an enigma for decades. Skeletal pneumaticity related to an air sac system is present in both derived non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs. But the question remained open whether this was a shared trait present in the common avemetatarsalian ancestor. We analyzed three taxa from the Late Triassic of South Brazil, which are some of the oldest representatives of this clade (233.23 ± 0.73 Ma), including two sauropodomorphs and one herrerasaurid. All three taxa present shallow lateral fossae in the centra of their presacral vertebrae. Foramina are present in many of the fossae but at diminutive sizes consistent with neurovascular rather than pneumatic origin. Micro-tomography reveals a chaotic architecture of dense apneumatic bone tissue in all three taxa. The early sauropodomorphs showed more complex vascularity, which possibly served as the framework for the future camerate and camellate pneumatic structures of more derived saurischians. Finally, the evidence of the absence of postcranial skeletal pneumaticity in the oldest dinosaurs contradicts the homology hypothesis for an invasive diverticula system and suggests that this trait evolved independently at least 3 times in pterosaurs, theropods, and sauropodomorphs.

Indexed as

DinosaursAir SacsAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsBone and BonesFossilsPhylogenySpine

Identifiers

PMID36494410
PMCPMC9734174
OpenAlexW4311672788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.