ArticleScientific reports2022
Unsupervised adaptation of an ECoG based brain-computer interface using neural correlates of task performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status and future prospects of brain-computer interfaces in the field of neurological disease rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- NEuroMOrphic Neural-Response Decoding System for Adaptive and Personalized Neuro-Prosthetics' Control.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mapping Eye, Arm, and Reward Information in Frontal Motor Cortices Using Electrocorticography in Nonhuman Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding Brain Signals in a Neuromorphic Framework for a Personalized Adaptive Control of Human Prosthetics.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mapping eye, arm, and reward information in frontal motor cortices using electrocorticography in non-human primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Low frequency independent components: Internal neuromarkers linking cortical LFPs to behavior.iScience · 2024Article
- Boosting brain-computer interfaces with functional electrical stimulation: potential applications in people with locked-in syndrome.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- Online adaptive group-wise sparse Penalized Recursive Exponentially Weighted N-way Partial Least Square for epidural intracranial BCI.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate brain signals into commands to external effectors, and mainly target severely disabled users. The usability of BCIs may be improved by reducing their major constraints, such as the necessity for special training sessions to initially calibrate and later keep up to date the neural signal decoders. In this study, we show that it is possible to train and update BCI decoders during free use of motor BCIs. In addition to the neural signal decoder controlling effectors (control decoder), one more classifier is proposed to detect neural correlates of BCI motor task performances (MTP). MTP decoders reveal whether the actions performed by BCI effectors matched the user's intentions. The combined outputs of MTP and control decoders allow forming training datasets to update the control decoder online and in real time during free use of BCIs. The usability of the proposed auto-adaptive BCI (aaBCI) is demonstrated for two principle BCIs paradigms: with discrete outputs (4 classes BCI, virtual 4-limb exoskeleton), and with continuous outputs (cursor 2D control). The proof of concept was performed in an online simulation study using an ECoG dataset collected from a tetraplegic during a BCI clinical trial. The control decoder reached a multiclass area under the ROC curve of 0.7404 using aaBCI, compared to a chance level of 0.5173 and to 0.8187 for supervised training for the multiclass BCI, and a cosine similarity of 0.1211 using aaBCI, compared to a chance level of 0.0036 and to 0.2002 for supervised training for the continuous BCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.