Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494325›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Is whole-body magnetic resonance imaging a source of anxiety in oncological patients?

Ketti Mazzocco, Derna Busacchio, Paul Eugene Summers, Chiara Marzorati, Paola Pricolo, Giuseppe Petralia, Gabriella Pravettoni

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Provider and patient perceptions on the usage of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: a scoping review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ketti MazzoccoApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-6779
Derna BusacchioApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Paul Eugene SummersDivision of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5085-1095
Chiara MarzoratiApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-2804
Paola PricoloDivision of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe PetraliaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8483-3816
Gabriella PravettoniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-4663
University of Milan · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMagnetic resonance often produces feelings of anxiety before, or during, the examination. The aim of this study was to assess anxiety and potential causes of anxiety in cancer patients undergoing whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI).

methodsThis monocentric study recruited 70 cancer patients who were scheduled to undergo WB-MRI for detection, staging or therapy monitoring. At baseline (prior to the WB-MRI), assessments were performed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y 1), Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), Big Five Inventory (BIF-10) and Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), while at the end of the WB-MRI examination the patients repeated the STAI-Y 1 questionnaire and were asked to indicate their preference between WB-MRI and computed tomography.

resultsWe found a positive correlation between pre- and post-examination STAI-Y 1 scores (r = 0.536, p < .0001), with no significant difference between them. Pre-examination STAI-Y 1 scores had a negative correlation with the emotional stability in the BIF-10 questionnaire (r = -0.47, p = .001) and a positive correlation with emotional representation (r = 0.57, p = .001) in IPQ-R. The post-examination STAI-Y 1 had a negative correlation with optimistic orientation (r = -0.59, p = .001).

conclusionsThe anxiety associated with a WB-MRI examination was only in small part associated with the examination itself, and in fact, most patients preferred WB-MRI to computed tomography. Concern with the outcome of the examination was likely a greater source of anxiety.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsAnxietyHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body Imaginganxietycancer patientsmagnetic resonance imagingpersonalized medicinepreferenceswhole-body MRI

Identifiers

PMID36494325
PMCPMC10026313
OpenAlexW4311020875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.