Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494253›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

Education level modifies parental hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccinations for their children.

Shuning Tang, Xin Liu, Yingnan Jia, Hao Chen, Pinpin Zheng, Hua Fu, Qianyi Xiao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Vaccine Uptake and Attitudes Among Parents Compared to Other Adults.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuning TangDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China.
Yingnan JiaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China; School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China.
Pinpin ZhengDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China; School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Hua FuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China; School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Qianyi XiaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, China; School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: xiaoqianyi@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to encourage parental acceptance of children's vaccination against COVID-19 to ensure population immunity and mitigate morbidity and mortality. This study drew upon protection motivation theory (PMT) to explore the factors of parental hesitancy about vaccinating their children. A national online survey was performed in China. A total of 2054 Chinese parents of children aged 6-12 years were included in this study. They reported on measures that assessed hesitancy about children's vaccination against COVID-19, PMT constructs (susceptibility, severity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, and response costs) and sociodemographic characteristics. Chinese parents reported a hesitancy rate of 29.4% for children's vaccination. Parents with higher level education were more likely to hesitate to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. After controlling for parents' and children's demographic variables, logistic regression showed that parents' hesitancy about their children's vaccination increased if parents had lower levels of susceptibility, response efficacy or self-efficacy, as well as higher levels of response costs. In addition, a high educational level can significantly increase the promotive effect of response cost and the protective effect of response efficacy on vaccine hesitancy. In conclusion, our findings suggested that PMT can explain parents' vaccine hesitancy and that education level can modify the effect of copying appraisal, but not threat appraisal, on parental hesitancy. This study will help public health officials send targeted messages to parents to improve the rate of COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 6-12 years and thus reach a higher level of immunity in the population.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesChildEducational StatusHumansParentsVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesChildrenCOVID-19ParentsProtection motivation theoryVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36494253
PMCPMC9705202
OpenAlexW4310191793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.