ArticleJournal of bioscience and bioengineering2023
Development of nucleic acid based lateral flow assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Article in Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design of a lateral flow assay targeting the conserved NIID_2019-nCoV_N gene region for molecular viral diagnosis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025Article
- The potential of tailed amplicons for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Nucleic Acid Lateral Flow Assays.PloS one · 2024Article
- Advances in Simple, Rapid, and Contamination-Free Instantaneous Nucleic Acid Devices for Pathogen Detection.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Updates on the Biofunctionalization of Gold Nanoparticles for the Rapid and Sensitive Multiplatform Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Virus and Its Proteins: From Computational Models to Validation in Human Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is still threat for humanity and its detection is crucial. Although real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is the most reliable method for detection of N protein genes, alternative methods for molecular detection are still needed. Thus, lateral flow assay models for 2019-nCoV_ N3 were developed for molecular detection. Briefly, gold nanoparticles were used as label and three sandwich models (1A, 1B, and 1.2) were designed. Prob concentrations on gold nanoparticles, types of sandwich model and membrane, limit of detection of target gene and buffer efficiency were studied. Model 1B has shown the best results with M170 membrane. Lower limit of detection was achieved by model 1.2 as 5 pM. All parameters have significant role for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assays, and these results will be useful for nucleic acid based lateral flow assays for viral detection or multiple detection of mutated forms in various detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.