Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494114›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of evidence-based dental practice2022

USE OF MOUTHWASH AND DENTIFRICE CONTAINING AN ANTIMICROBIAL PHTHALOCYANINE DERIVATIVE FOR THE REDUCTION OF CLINICAL SYMPTOMS OF COVID-19: A RANDOMIZED TRIPLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL.

Marcelo Lupion Poleti, Danielle Gregório, Alisson Gabriel Idelfonso Bistaffa, Karen Barros Parron Fernandes, Fabiano Vieira Vilhena, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos, Andréa Name Colado Simão, Marcell Alysson Batisti Lozovoy, Berenice Tomoko Tatibana, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of evidence-based dental practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcelo Lupion PoletiFederal Institute of Paraná, Londrina, PR, Brazil. Electronic address: marcelo_poleti@yahoo.com.br.
Danielle GregórioUniversity of North Paraná (UNOPAR), Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Alisson Gabriel Idelfonso BistaffaUniversity of North Paraná (UNOPAR), Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Karen Barros Parron FernandesSchool of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana (PUCPR), Londrina, PR, Brazil; Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada.
Fabiano Vieira VilhenaTrials - Oral Health & Technologies, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Sérgio da Silva SantosDepartment of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology, and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Andréa Name Colado SimãoResearch Laboratory in Applied Immunology, Department of Pathology, Clinical Analysis and Toxicology, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Marcell Alysson Batisti LozovoyResearch Laboratory in Applied Immunology, Department of Pathology, Clinical Analysis and Toxicology, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Berenice Tomoko TatibanaFederal Institute of Paraná, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Thais Maria Freire FernandesUniversity of North Paraná (UNOPAR), Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Universidade Norte do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BREntomological Society of Brazil · BRInstituto Federal do Paraná · BRTechnologies pour la Santé · FRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis clinical trial aimed to evaluate the use of mouthwash and dentifrice containing an antimicrobial phthalocyanine derivative (APD) to reduce the clinical symptoms in patients with COVID-19.

methodsThis randomized, triple-blind clinical trial enrolled 134 patients aged 18 years or older who underwent COVID-19 testing through the use of nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR in a reference center for the diagnosis of COVID-19, had no clinical contraindications to mouthwash and gargle, and had access to cell phones with communication applications. According to the use of a mouthwash and dentifrice containing antimicrobial phthalocyanine derivatives (APD), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the APD or non-APD (control) group. All participants were instructed to floss twice a day, brush teeth for 2 minutes 3 times a day, and gargle/rinse (5 mL) for 1 min/3 times a day for 7 days. An online questionnaire was sent to collect data on the clinical symptoms of COVID-19 3 times: T0 (baseline before using the oral hygiene products), T3 (3 days after), and T7 (7 days after). The investigators, patients, and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. The Mann-Whitney, Chi-Square, Fisher's exact, and Cochran's tests were used according to the nature of the variables studied, with the level of significance set at P < .05.

resultsNo statistically significant difference was found in the prevalence of symptoms between groups at baseline. A statistically significant reduction in clinical symptoms was found in the control group (fatigue, shortness of breath, hoarse voice, sore throat, nasal congestion, and chest pain) and APD group (cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, hyposmia/anosmia, dysgeusia, hoarse voice, sore throat, nasal congestion, chest pain, diarrhea, and irritability/confusion) during the follow-up period. There were statistically significant differences, with a higher prevalence of symptoms in the control group at T3 and T7. Dysgeusia, sore throat, and irritability/confusion were less prevalent in the APD group at T3, and shortness of breath, hyposmia/anosmia, dysgeusia, hoarse voice, sore throat, diarrhea, and irritability/confusion were more prevalent in the control group at T7.

conclusionsBased on this methodology, the results demonstrated that the regular use of mouthwash and dentifrice-containing APD had a positive impact on the clinical symptoms, as reported by patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCOVID-19Chest PainCOVID-19 TestingDouble-Blind MethodHumansIsoindolesMouthwashesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective AgentsIsoindolesMouthwashesphthalocyanineClinical symptomsCovid-19DentifricesMouthwash

Identifiers

PMID36494114
PMCPMC9472577
OpenAlexW4296023625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.