Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494081›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Patient experiences of, and preferences for, surgical wound care education.

Georgia Tobiano, Rachel M Walker, Wendy Chaboyer, Joan Carlini, Louise Webber, Sharon Latimer, Evelyn Kang, Anne M Eskes, Tom O'Connor, Debra Perger and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A critical overview of challenging roles of medicinal plants in improvement of wound healing technology.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Co-producing shared wound care education: experiences of service users and healthcare professionals.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Collaboration Breakdowns Between Provider Teams and Patients in Post-Surgery Care.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.

Georgia TobianoCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-0777
Rachel M WalkerCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Wendy ChaboyerCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Joan CarliniCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Louise WebberWound Therapies, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Sharon LatimerCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-150X
Evelyn KangCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Anne M EskesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Tom O'ConnorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-0975
Debra PergerCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Brigid M GillespieCentre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Griffith University · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

Griffith University New Researcher GrantNHMRC Centre for Research Excellence APP1196436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe patients' experiences of, and preferences for, surgical wound care discharge education and how these experiences predicted their ability to self-manage their surgical wounds. A telephone survey of 270 surgical patients was conducted across two hospitals two weeks after discharge. Patients preferred verbal (n = 255, 94.8%) and written surgical wound education (n = 178, 66.2%) from medical (n = 229, 85.4%) and nursing staff (n = 211, 78.7%) at discharge. The most frequent education content that patients received was information about follow-up appointments (n = 242, 89.6%) and who to contact in the community with wound care concerns (n = 233, 86.6%). Using logistic regression, patients who perceived that they participated in surgical wound care decisions were 6.5 times more likely to state that they were able to manage their wounds at home. Also, patients who agreed that medical and/or nursing staff discussed wound pain management were 3.1 times more likely to report being able to manage their surgical wounds at home. Only 40% (107/270) of patients actively participated in wound-related decision-making during discharge education. These results uncovered patient preferences, which could be used to optimise discharge education practices. Embedding patient participation into clinical workflows may enhance patients' self-management practices once home.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicSelf CareSurgical WoundAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient PreferenceQueenslandSurveys and Questionnairespatient education as topicpatient participationsurgical woundssurveys and questionnaireswounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID36494081
PMCPMC10088828
OpenAlexW4311022201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.