Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2023
Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 360 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Abemaciclib Combined With Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Alone in Patients With High Risk, Node Positive, Early Stage, Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative, Breast Cancer
Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Abemaciclib Dose Escalation Strategy in Adjuvant Therapy for Early High-Risk Breast Cancer
Who cites it
360 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 525 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacotherapy for older adults with cancer: a digest of the Japanese clinical practice guidelines (second edition)-breast cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Pooled it
- Oncologic Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Targeted Axillary Dissection for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- [Systemic treatment of breast cancer: professional guideline].Magyar onkologia · 2025Guideline
- Multidisciplinary Practical Guidance for Implementing Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Patients with HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Guideline
- Prognosis of ER-positive, HER2-negative postmenopausal early breast cancer patients based on response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and multigene assay results: findings from the NEOS trial.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Omission of Axillary Surgery in Patients with Negative Axillary Evaluation Integrated with LymphPET: A Prospective Clinical Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based App for Adverse Effect Management in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Oral Targeted Therapy or Chemotherapy: Findings from a Pilot Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Trial
- Prognostic relation of body mass index on extended aromatase inhibition treatment in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of the SOLE trial.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2025Trial
- Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay Is a Highly Prognostic Biomarker in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor: Results from the NATALEE Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Metronomic Capecitabine Plus Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Phase III MECCA Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy in early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in high-risk, early-stage, ERNature medicine · 2025Trial
- Tracking CDK1 Dynamics With a Novel Biosensor Mouse and Clinical Cohorts to Predict CDK4/6 Inhibitor Sensitivity in ER+ Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy.Cureus · 2026Article
300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdjuvant abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy previously showed a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2)-negative, node-positive, high-risk, early breast cancer. Here, we report updated results from an interim analysis to assess overall survival as well as invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival with additional follow-up.
methodsIn monarchE, an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were recruited from 603 sites including hospitals and academic and community centres in 38 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by means of an interactive web-based response system (block size of 4), stratified by previous chemotherapy, menopausal status, and region, to receive standard-of-care endocrine therapy of physician's choice for up to 10 years with or without abemaciclib 150 mg orally twice a day for 2 years (treatment period). All therapies were administered in an open-label manner without masking. High-risk disease was defined as either four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or between one and three positive axillary lymph nodes and either grade 3 disease or tumour size of 5 cm or larger (cohort 1). A smaller group of patients were enrolled with between one and three positive axillary lymph nodes and Ki-67 of at least 20% as an additional risk feature (cohort 2). This was a prespecified overall survival interim analysis planned to occur 2 years after the primary outcome analysis for invasive disease-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03155997, and is ongoing.
findingsBetween July 17, 2017, and Aug 12, 2019, 5637 patients were randomly assigned (5601 [99·4%] were women and 36 [0·6%] were men). 2808 were assigned to receive abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and 2829 were assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone. At a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR 37-47), median invasive disease-free survival was not reached in either group and the invasive disease-free survival benefit previously reported was sustained: HR 0·664 (95% CI 0·578-0·762, nominal p<0·0001). At 4 years, the absolute difference in invasive disease-free survival between the groups was 6·4% (85·8% [95% CI 84·2-87·3] in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group vs 79·4% [77·5-81·1] in the endocrine therapy alone group). 157 (5·6%) of 2808 patients in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group died compared with 173 (6·1%) of 2829 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group (HR 0·929, 95% CI 0·748-1·153; p=0·50). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (in 548 [19·6%] of 2791 patients receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy vs 24 [0·9%] of 2800 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group), leukopenia (318 [11·4%] vs 11 [0·4%]), and diarrhoea (218 [7·8%] vs six [0·2%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 433 (15·5%) of 2791 patients receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus 256 (9·1%) of 2800 receiving endocrine therapy. There were two treatment-related deaths in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group (diarrhoea and pneumonitis) and none in the endocrine therapy alone group.
interpretationAdjuvant abemaciclib reduces the risk of recurrence. The benefit is sustained beyond the completion of treatment with an absolute increase at 4 years, further supporting the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Further follow-up is needed to establish whether overall survival can be improved with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in these patients.
fundingEli Lilly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.