Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36493792›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2023

Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Stephen R D Johnston, Masakazu Toi, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Priya Rastogi, Mario Campone, Patrick Neven, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Jens Huober, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe, Irfan Cicin and 15 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 360 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
360citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
74.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03155997 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Abemaciclib Combined With Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Alone in Patients With High Risk, Node Positive, Early Stage, Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative, Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2017 to 2029Enrolled5,637ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAbemaciclib, Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
NCT07599137 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Abemaciclib Dose Escalation Strategy in Adjuvant Therapy for Early High-Risk Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteRan2026 to 2028Enrolled86ConditionsHR+/HER2- Breast CancerArmsDose escalation, Dose Escalation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

360 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 525 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay Is a Highly Prognostic Biomarker in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. JCO precision oncology · 2025
    Trial
  16. Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Stephen R D JohnstonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: stephen.johnston@rmh.nhs.uk.
Masakazu ToiKyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Joyce O'ShaughnessyBaylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
Priya RastogiUniversity of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mario CamponeInstitute de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre Rene Cauducheau, Saint-Herblain, Nantes, France.
Patrick NevenUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Chiun-Sheng HuangNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jens HuoberCantonal Hospital St Gallen, Breast Centre St Gallen, Switzerland.
Georgina Garnica JaliffeGrupo Medico Camino SC, Mexico City, Mexico.
Irfan CicinTrakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Sara M TolaneyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew P GoetzDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California San Francisco Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elzbieta SenkusDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Laura TestaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Lucia Del MastroIRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, UO Breast Unit, Genoa, Italy; Università di Genova, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIM), Genoa, Italy.
Chikako ShimizuNational Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ran WeiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ashwin ShahirLoxo@Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Maria MunozLoxo@Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Belen San AntonioLoxo@Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Valérie AndréEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Miguel MartinHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
monarchE Committee Members
Loxo Oncology at Lilly (United States) · USEli Lilly (United States) · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRGdańsk Medical University · PLHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRKyoto University · JPLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNSABP Foundation · USOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBTexas Oncology · USTrakya University · TRUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of St. Gallen · CH

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Department of HealthNCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy previously showed a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2)-negative, node-positive, high-risk, early breast cancer. Here, we report updated results from an interim analysis to assess overall survival as well as invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival with additional follow-up.

methodsIn monarchE, an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were recruited from 603 sites including hospitals and academic and community centres in 38 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by means of an interactive web-based response system (block size of 4), stratified by previous chemotherapy, menopausal status, and region, to receive standard-of-care endocrine therapy of physician's choice for up to 10 years with or without abemaciclib 150 mg orally twice a day for 2 years (treatment period). All therapies were administered in an open-label manner without masking. High-risk disease was defined as either four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or between one and three positive axillary lymph nodes and either grade 3 disease or tumour size of 5 cm or larger (cohort 1). A smaller group of patients were enrolled with between one and three positive axillary lymph nodes and Ki-67 of at least 20% as an additional risk feature (cohort 2). This was a prespecified overall survival interim analysis planned to occur 2 years after the primary outcome analysis for invasive disease-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03155997, and is ongoing.

findingsBetween July 17, 2017, and Aug 12, 2019, 5637 patients were randomly assigned (5601 [99·4%] were women and 36 [0·6%] were men). 2808 were assigned to receive abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and 2829 were assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone. At a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR 37-47), median invasive disease-free survival was not reached in either group and the invasive disease-free survival benefit previously reported was sustained: HR 0·664 (95% CI 0·578-0·762, nominal p<0·0001). At 4 years, the absolute difference in invasive disease-free survival between the groups was 6·4% (85·8% [95% CI 84·2-87·3] in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group vs 79·4% [77·5-81·1] in the endocrine therapy alone group). 157 (5·6%) of 2808 patients in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group died compared with 173 (6·1%) of 2829 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group (HR 0·929, 95% CI 0·748-1·153; p=0·50). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (in 548 [19·6%] of 2791 patients receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy vs 24 [0·9%] of 2800 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group), leukopenia (318 [11·4%] vs 11 [0·4%]), and diarrhoea (218 [7·8%] vs six [0·2%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 433 (15·5%) of 2791 patients receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus 256 (9·1%) of 2800 receiving endocrine therapy. There were two treatment-related deaths in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group (diarrhoea and pneumonitis) and none in the endocrine therapy alone group.

interpretationAdjuvant abemaciclib reduces the risk of recurrence. The benefit is sustained beyond the completion of treatment with an absolute increase at 4 years, further supporting the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Further follow-up is needed to establish whether overall survival can be improved with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in these patients.

fundingEli Lilly.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesDiarrheaErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalabemaciclibAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36493792
PMCPMC11200328
OpenAlexW4311018441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.