ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023
Genome-wide analysis of copy-number variation in humans with cleft lip and/or cleft palate identifies COBLL1, RIC1, and ARHGEF38 as clefting genes.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of Rho GTPases in facial morphogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026Review
- [Association analysis between dystrophin gene polymorphism and non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026Article
- Consensus-based detection of aetiologic copy number variants for syndromic orofacial clefts utilising whole exome sequencing of case parent trios.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Consensus-based Detection of Aetiologic Copy Number Variants For Syndromic Orofacial Clefts Utilising Whole Exome Sequencing of Case Parent Trios.Research square · 2026Article
- Is 7p14.1 an orofacial cleft risk locus? Genome-wide study of copy number variation in multiple populations provides both a replication of previous studies and an alternative explanation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Decoding structural birth defects through genomic landscapes: Innovative frameworks for diagnosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals individual and cohort level insights into chromosome 9p syndromes.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- The developmental bases of cleft lip and cleft palate: cellular and molecular mechanisms.Anatomy & cell biology · 2025Review
- Copy number variants and their implications for developmental and behavioural problems in cleft lip and/or palate.Human molecular genetics · 2025Article
- SNP-associated differential methylation inEpigenomics · 2025Article
- Rare variants found in multiplex families with orofacial clefts: Does expanding the phenotype make a difference?American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023Article
- Rare variants found in multiplex families with orofacial clefts: Does expanding the phenotype make a difference?medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Ultra-Rare Variants Identify Biological Pathways and Candidate Genes in the Pathobiology of Non-Syndromic Cleft Palate Only.Biomolecules · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) is a common birth defect with a complex, heterogeneous etiology. It is well established that common and rare sequence variants contribute to the formation of CL/P, but the contribution of copy-number variants (CNVs) to cleft formation remains relatively understudied. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted a large-scale comparative analysis of genome-wide CNV profiles of 869 individuals from the Philippines and 233 individuals of European ancestry with CL/P with three primary goals: first, to evaluate whether differences in CNV number, amount of genomic content, or amount of coding genomic content existed within clefting subtypes; second, to assess whether CNVs in our cohort overlapped with known Mendelian clefting loci; and third, to identify unestablished Mendelian clefting genes. Significant differences in CNVs across cleft types or in individuals with non-syndromic versus syndromic clefts were not observed; however, several CNVs in our cohort overlapped with known syndromic and non-syndromic Mendelian clefting loci. Moreover, employing a filtering strategy relying on population genetics data that rare variants are on the whole more deleterious than common variants, we identify several CNV-associated gene losses likely driving non-syndromic clefting phenotypes. By prioritizing genes deleted at a rare frequency across multiple individuals with clefts yet enriched in our cohort of individuals with clefts compared to control subjects, we identify COBLL1, RIC1, and ARHGEF38 as clefting genes. CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis of these genes in Xenopus laevis and Danio rerio yielded craniofacial dysmorphologies, including clefts analogous to those seen in human clefting disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.