Observational studyClinical imaging2023
Access to cardiac PET/CT by sarcoidosis patients and cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac PET/MR compared to the standard of care.
Observational study in Clinical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alternate CMS Payment Structure for Outpatient Services: A Road to Improving Access to Molecular Imaging in Oncologic Care.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2023Article
- Combined FDG PET/MRI versus Standard-of-Care Imaging in the Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceCardiac sarcoidosis is associated with a high mortality rate. Given multiple barriers to obtaining cardiac PET imaging, we suspect individuals with access to this imaging modality are not representative of the Sarcoid patient population, which in the United States are predominantly Black females.
objectiveTo evaluate the demographics of patients with cardiac PET access and the cost-effectiveness of cardiac PET/MR imaging relative to standard of care.
designThis is a retrospective, observational study. The demographic information of patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis and cardiac PET/CT imaging within a national registry of sarcoidosis were reviewed (n = 4561). An individual-level, continuous, time-state transition model was used for the evaluation of long-term cost-effectiveness for the combined cardiac PET/MR compared to standard of care cardiac MR followed by cardiac PET/CT.
resultsPatients who underwent cardiac PET in the national registry had 88.35% higher odds of being male (p < 0.001) and 43.82% higher odds of being White (p = 0.003) than their counterparts who did not have cardiac PET imaging. Combined cardiac PET/MR had overall lower total lifetime costs ($8761 vs $10,777) and overall improved expected quality of life-years compared to the standard of care (0.77 vs 0.69). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that patients with access to cardiac PET/CT are not representative of the patient population most likely to have cardiac sarcoidosis in this limited study evaluation. Universal insurance coverage should be considered for Cardiac PET imaging as same day cardiac PET and MR imaging has potential long-term cost and quality of life benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.