ArticleESMO open2022
Risk of thromboembolism in non-small-cell lung cancers patients with different oncogenic drivers, including ROS1, ALK, and EGFR mutations.
Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arterial and venous thromboembolic events in patients with cancer treated with targeted therapies: a population-based cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- The Association Between Thromboembolic Events and ALK, ROS1, RET Rearrangements or EGFR Mutations in Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Case Report: Popliteal arterial tumor embolus as the initial presentation of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with pulmonary-vein invasion.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: Secondary Analyses of the Rising-VTE/NEJ037 Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted anti-cancer agents and risk of venous thromboembolism.Haematologica · 2024Review
- Thrombotic risk of platinum combination chemotherapy with and without immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide inpatient database study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Article
- A New Risk Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism and Death in Ambulatory Lung Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Role of EGFR Amplification in Deep Venous Thrombosis Occurrence in IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive (ROS1+) lung cancers have been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. This study aimed to assess the long-term risk of developing thromboembolism (TE) in ROS1+ lung cancer and to compare it with other oncogenic drivers in the Asian population. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled a cohort of ROS1+ lung adenocarcinoma in a medical center in Taiwan and a comparison cohort of ALK+ and epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (EGFR+) lung cancers. Venous and arterial TEs were identified throughout the cancer course, and the incidence rate was calculated.
resultsWe enrolled 44 ROS1+, 98 ALK+, and 168 EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 11 (25%), 36 (36.7%), and 38 (22.6%) patients in the ROS1, ALK, and EGFR cohorts, respectively, were diagnosed with thromboembolic events throughout the follow-up course of the disease (P = 0.042). The incidence rates were 99.0, 91.9, and 82.5 events per 1000 person-years for the ROS1, ALK, and EGFR cohorts, respectively. The majority of thrombosis events in the ROS1 (91.6%) and ALK (85.4%) cohorts were venous. On the contrary, 43.2% of thromboembolic events were arterial in the EGFR cohort. A higher proportion of thromboembolic events were noted during cancer diagnosis in the ROS1 cohort (36.3%) than in the ALK (16.7%) and EGFR (10.5%) cohorts. The stage was the only clinical variable associated with thromboembolic risk. There was a significant difference in survival between patients with and without TE in the EGFR cohort, but not in the ALK and ROS1 cohorts.
conclusionsAlthough ROS1+ and ALK+ NSCLCs had a higher cumulative incidence of TE than EGFR+ NSCLC, the person-year incidence rates were similar among the three groups. EGFR-mutated NSCLC had more arterial events. Nevertheless, ALK+ lung cancer had higher venous events than EGFR-mutated lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.