Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36490296›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Costs, effectiveness, and safety associated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: Results from a comprehensive cancer center.

Sérgio Chacim, Teresa Monjardino, José Luís Cunha, Pedro Medeiros, Patrícia Redondo, Maria José Bento, José Mário Mariz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adoptive cell therapies in thoracic malignancies: a comprehensive review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Total costs of different lines of treatment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark - a real-world data analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The clinical landscape of CAR NK cells.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sérgio ChacimDepartment of Onco-hematology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Teresa MonjardinoCancer Epidemiology Group, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-3366
José Luís CunhaOutcomes Research Lab, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Pedro MedeirosOutcomes Research Lab, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Patrícia RedondoOutcomes Research Lab, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.
Maria José BentoCancer Epidemiology Group, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal.
José Mário MarizDepartment of Onco-hematology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real world effectiveness, toxicity and costs analyses from chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy are of utmost relevance to determine whether and how to offer patients highly personalized immunotherapy. In this study, we aimed at describing CAR T-cells effectiveness, safety and costs in a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Center. We performed a retrospective descriptive study of adult patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma referred to CAR T-cell therapy, between May 2019 and February 2021. Rates of treatment response, toxicity and survival (Kaplan-Meier method) were analyzed by intention-to-treat. Direct medical costs stratified by inpatient-care, outpatient-care, and diagnostic-therapeutic procedures (DTP) were derived based on resources used and their respective unit costs. In twenty patients (median age 49.5y; 55%male; 70%DLBCL; 50% with primary refractory disease), best overall and complete response rates were 65.0% and 45.0%, respectively. Median overall (OS) and progression-free survivals were 9.2 and 7.3 months; 12-month OS rate was 42.6% (95%CI:23.2-78.3). Grade≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 5.6% and 11.1% of patients, respectively. CAR T-cell therapy expenditure, including adverse events costs, was 7 176 196€, or 286 238€ when excluding drug cost. Median cost for treated patient was 355 165€ with CAR T-cell drug cost accounting for 97.0% of the overall expense. Excluding CAR T-cell acquisition cost, inpatient-care and DTP accounted for 57% and 38% of total cost/patient, respectively. Our findings highlight the heavy economic burden of CAR T-cell therapy driven by drug acquisition costs.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAntigens, CD19Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCytokine Release SyndromeHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36490296
PMCPMC9733886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.