ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2022
Selecting initial therapy in CLL.
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Italy: Real-World Evidence on Utilization, Outcomes, and Healthcare Costs.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Real-world cardiac events and outcomes in cBTKi-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Overall Survival Associated with Real-World Treatment Sequences in Patients with CLL/SLL in the United States.Cancers · 2025Article
- CD38 prognostic role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with standard chemotherapy or targeted agents: a monocentric real-life experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- First-Line Treatment of Older Patients with CLL: A New Approach in the Chemo-Free Era.Cancers · 2023Review
- Advancements in the Treatment of CLL: The Rise of Zanubrutinib as a Preferred Therapeutic Option.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted therapy is a powerful treatment option in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that has outperformed conventional chemoimmunotherapy in most clinical settings. Except for selected young, fit patients with a mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene, most patients benefit from targeted therapy with either a continuous BTK inhibitor or 1-year fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab as first-line treatment of CLL. Treatment selection is driven by patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors, encompassing patient preference, concomitant medications, comorbidities, safety profile of the regimen, and TP53 aberration. Clinical trials are actively investigating the simultaneous inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) proteins with or without a CD20 monoclonal antibody, which can achieve deep response in most patients (52%-89% undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.