ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2022
Transplant in AML with measurable residual disease: proceed or defer?
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRD-driven HDACi-based therapy post-transplant: a real-world study in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Trial
- Pretransplant MRD does not seem to affect survival in NPM1-mutated AML undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Measurable residual disease testing and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML: adapting Pre-MEASURE to clinical practice.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Review
- Review
- Novel immunotherapies in the treatment of AML: is there hope?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Article
- Measurable residual disease in patients undergoing allogeneic transplant for acute myeloid leukemia.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2023Review
- Targeting Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Moving beyond Prognostication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation plays a central role in the management of fit adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete morphologic remission (CR1). Advances in both donor selection and transplant technology have both dramatically increased accessibility of transplant and led to significant reductions in transplant-related mortality over the past 2 decades. There has, however, been no concomitant reduction in the risk of disease relapse, which remains the major cause of transplant failure. Pivotal to the design of innovative strategies with the potential to reduce relapse risk is accurate identification of patients at the highest risk of disease recurrence. Multiple retrospective studies have identified an increased risk of disease relapse in patients allografted for AML in CR1 with evidence of pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD). The prognostic significance of pretransplant MRD has been confirmed recently in prospective analyses. The optimal management of patients with evidence of pretransplant MRD remains a matter of conjecture with regard to 2 key issues. First, should the presence of pretransplant MRD delay a decision to proceed to transplant, allowing time for delivery of additional MRD-directed therapy prior to transplant? Second, to what extent can the intensity of the conditioning regimen or the magnitude of the graft-vs-leukemia effect be manipulated to improve the outcome of such patients?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.