Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36485023›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Conceptions of Legacy Among People Making Treatment Choices for Serious Illness: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Marlaine Figueroa Gray, Matthew P Banegas, Nora B Henrikson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Legacy in End-of-Life Care: A Concept Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marlaine Figueroa GrayKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-3968
Matthew P BanegasKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6158-7162
Nora B HenriksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-7787
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Legacy Project - Diversity SupplementR01CA237322 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BANEGAS, MATTHEW P, HENRIKSON, NORA B. · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLegacy-what one leaves behind and how one hopes to be remembered after death-is an unexplored and important dimension of decision-making for people facing serious illnesses. A preliminary literature review suggests that patients facing serious illness consider legacy when making medical decisions, for example, forgoing expensive treatment with limited or unknown clinical benefit to preserve one's inheritance for their children. To date, very little is known about the conceptual foundations of legacy. No conceptual frameworks exist that provide a comprehensive understanding of how legacy considerations relate to patient choices about their medical care.

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of research addressing the concept of legacy by people facing serious illness to inform a conceptual framework of legacy and patient treatment choices.

methodsThis protocol follows the guidelines put forth by Levac et al, which expands the framework introduced by Arksey and O'Malley, as well as the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's manual. This scoping review will explore several electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and others and will include legacy-specific gray literature, including dissertation research available via ProQuest. An initial search will be conducted in English-language literature from 1990 to the present with selected keywords to identify relevant articles and refine the search strategy. After the search strategy has been finalized, 2 independent reviewers will undertake a 2-part study selection process. In the first step, reviewers will screen article titles and abstracts to identify the eligibility of each article based on predetermined exclusion or inclusion criteria. A third senior reviewer will arbitrate discrepancies regarding inclusions or exclusions. During the second step, the full texts will be screened by 2 reviewers, and only relevant articles will be kept. Relevant study data will be extracted, collated, and charted to summarize the key findings related to the construct of legacy.

resultsThis study will identify how people facing serious illness define legacy, and how their thinking about legacy impacts the choices they make about their medical treatments. We will note gaps in the literature base. The findings of this study will inform a conceptual model that outlines how ideas about legacy impact the patient's treatment choices. The results of this study will be submitted to an indexed journal.

conclusionsVery little is known about the role of legacy in the treatment decisions of patients across the continuum of serious illness. In particular, no comprehensive conceptual model exists that would provide an understanding of how legacy is considered by people making decisions about their care during serious illness. This study will be among the first to construct a conceptual model detailing how considerations of legacy impact medical decision-making for people facing or living with serious illnesses. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40791.

Indexed as

choiceclinical decisioncommunicationconceptual frameworkcritical illnessdecision-makingdyingend of lifeend-of-life care-ethicsethicethicallegacylibrarianlibrary sciencepalliativepsychological carequality of lifereview methodologyscoping reviewsearch strategyserious illnessspiritualspiritual care

Identifiers

PMID36485023
PMCPMC9789496
OpenAlexW4311132728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.