Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
The clinical relevance of human papillomavirus negative status in unsatisfactory cervical cytology.
Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) negativity at the time of unsatisfactory cervical cytology.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study, records were reviewed for patients who had unsatisfactory cervical cytology with HR-HPV testing performed from January 2015 through September 2019 at a large teaching hospital. Pathology results of follow-up cervical cytology and biopsies were assessed.
resultsOf 1282 patients with unsatisfactory cervical cytology and negative HR-HPV testing, repeat cytology was negative for intraepithelial lesion (NIL) in 952 (75%) patients, unsatisfactory in 273 (22%) patients, and abnormal in 41 (3%) patients. Median follow-up time was 91 days. The concordance of HR-HPV status between initial unsatisfactory cervical cytology and subsequent satisfactory cervical cytology was 96.3% for HR-HPV negative patients and 68.8% for HR-HPV positive patients. Compared to women who were HR-HPV negative, women who were HR-HPV positive on initial unsatisfactory cytology were at higher risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or greater (odds ratio = 4.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-18.03 for E6/E7 mRNA positivity alone; odds ratio = 46.13, 95% confidence interval: 13.45-158.01 for HR-HPV genotype 16 or 18/45 positivity).
conclusionIn the 3 month follow-up of patients with unsatisfactory cervical cytology and negative HR-HPV testing, approximately 3% had abnormal cytology but no cases of HPV related pathology of CIN 2 or greater were found. There was high concordance of negative HR-HPV testing results with those on follow-up satisfactory cervical cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36484851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.