ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Computational prediction and characterization of cell-type-specific and shared binding sites.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational models for the classification of antibody specificity using heavy chain features.PloS one · 2026Article
- Cancer classification in high dimensional microarray gene expressions by feature selection using eagle prey optimization.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Cross-Species Prediction of Transcription Factor Binding by Adversarial Training of a Novel Nucleotide-Level Deep Neural Network.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Enhancer-driven gene regulatory networks inference from single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of models in predicting the effects of SNPs on TF-DNA binding using large-scale in vitro and in vivo data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- CEMIG: prediction of the cis-regulatory motif using the de Bruijn graph from ATAC-seq.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- HAMPLE: deciphering TF-DNA binding mechanism in different cellular environments by characterizing higher-order nucleotide dependency.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Benefiting from the intrinsic role of epigenetics to predict patterns of CTCF binding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCell-type-specific gene expression is maintained in large part by transcription factors (TFs) selectively binding to distinct sets of sites in different cell types. Recent research works have provided evidence that such cell-type-specific binding is determined by TF's intrinsic sequence preferences, cooperative interactions with co-factors, cell-type-specific chromatin landscapes and 3D chromatin interactions. However, computational prediction and characterization of cell-type-specific and shared binding sites is rarely studied.
resultsIn this article, we propose two computational approaches for predicting and characterizing cell-type-specific and shared binding sites by integrating multiple types of features, in which one is based on XGBoost and another is based on convolutional neural network (CNN). To validate the performance of our proposed approaches, ChIP-seq datasets of 10 binding factors were collected from the GM12878 (lymphoblastoid) and K562 (erythroleukemic) human hematopoietic cell lines, each of which was further categorized into cell-type-specific (GM12878- and K562-specific) and shared binding sites. Then, multiple types of features for these binding sites were integrated to train the XGBoost- and CNN-based models. Experimental results show that our proposed approaches significantly outperform other competing methods on three classification tasks. Moreover, we identified independent feature contributions for cell-type-specific and shared sites through SHAP values and explored the ability of the CNN-based model to predict cell-type-specific and shared binding sites by excluding or including DNase signals. Furthermore, we investigated the generalization ability of our proposed approaches to different binding factors in the same cellular environment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is available at: https://github.com/turningpoint1988/CSSBS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.