Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36484580›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2022

The Cannabis Policy Scale: A New Research and Surveillance Tool for U.S. States.

Jason G Blanchette, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Rosanna Smart, Marlene C Lira, Seema Choksy Pessar, Timothy S Naimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alcohol and Cannabis Use and Co-Use among Ethnic Groups in California.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason G BlanchetteBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rosalie Liccardo PaculaSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Rosanna SmartRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Marlene C LiraBoston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Seema Choksy PessarLeonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Timothy S NaimiCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Impact of Marijuana Policies on Alcohol Use and Alcohol-Related MortalityR01AA026268 · NIAAA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI NAIMI, TIMOTHY SIMONDS · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026268NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRapid shifts toward cannabis liberalization in the United States have created immense policy variability that is challenging to measure. We developed composite measures to characterize the restrictiveness of U.S. state cannabis policy environments.

methodNine panelists, consisting of four research team members and five expert policy consultants, nominated distinct cannabis policies pertaining to cannabis prohibition, medicalization, and legalization for recreational use. For each of the 17 nominated policies, panelists developed implementation ratings and rated each policy's relative efficacy for reducing excessive cannabis use by adults, youth use, and impaired driving. Cannabis Policy Scale scores were then calculated for each state-year for all 50 states from 1999 to 2019 by weighting policies by their efficacy and implementation ratings, and then summing over policies.

resultsMedian Cannabis Policy Scale scores remained stable until 2008, when they started declining (representing policy liberalization), with steeper declines after 2012. In 2019, state Cannabis Policy Scale scores targeting excessive use among the general population ranged from 29.6 to 66.7 for recreational cannabis legalization states, and from 72.4 to 93.4 for medical cannabis legalization states. Cannabis Policy Scale scores using youth-specific and driving-specific efficacy ratings showed similar trends.

conclusionsThe Cannabis Policy Scale reflects trends toward liberalization of cannabis policy in many U.S. states. Even within crude policy phenotypes (e.g., medical cannabis programs), Cannabis Policy Scale scores varied considerably between states and over time. The Cannabis Policy Scale is a new measure that can add nuance to cannabis policy research and help assess cannabis policy-outcome relationships.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCannabisMedical MarijuanaHumansLegislation, DrugPublic PolicyUnited StatesMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID36484580
PMCPMC9756403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.